Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
alexroark5
About
- Username
- alexroark5
- Joined
- Visits
- 434
- Last Active
- Roles
- Member, Inactive ⭐
Comments
-
Agreed with PJ, the answer is definitely no. The most important thing is to get a good read. The LSAT passages try to lose you with multiple viewpoints, embedded clauses/modifiers, referential phrasing etc. I love sports, grew up an athlete my whole…
-
Hey this is minor but I think it is extremely effective. If you notice JY when he does the games, whenever the pieces are 4 or more, he writes them in blocks. So say for example you are given 7 pieces: A B C D E F G Instead of writing them out in a…
-
I live in DC and am taking in february. feel free to contact me as well
-
If you want to do better, then yes you should.
-
haha casual flaws are hard to spot
-
I think for all three sections, LR, LG, and RC, it comes down to pattern recognition. You can start to see patterns in the LR questions, or patterns in how certain game types tend to work, or patterns in the structure of RC passages. Pattern recogni…
-
AI! You rock at positive energy!
-
I"m taking in Dec. I'd be interested in meeting up once a week to go over lsat stuff. I live in crystal city. Scoring in the high 160s/low170s
-
Reviewing PT's is how you get better. Actually taking the PTs just measures your progress. It usually takes me about 6/7 hours to review one PT in full. Just by repeating this simple process of taking PTs and thoroughly reviewing them, I have been a…
-
I have thoroughly been through material offered by manhattan, powerscore, velocity, and 7sage. I think that being exposed to a variety of sources is an advantage because it has provided me with a lot of different tools that I can use to attack the t…
-
Any idea when this is going to be fixed?