That is doable considering you could dedicate the majority of your time to logic games. Aside from being the easiest section to improve, it takes little more than constant repetition to be honest.
Quality over quantity. If it takes you a whole week to take one PT then take the whole week but master it. I approach it from the view that I'd be better off mastering the last 20 exams rather than taking every PT since 36 to the current, even thoug…
1. Is it wise to submit an application in November with the intention of updating it pending a December LSAT score? Alternatively, is it wise to submit an application without an LSAT score and then update the application with a score once it's recei…
I'm 23 yrs old and graduated from college in May 2015. I plan to attend law school in the fall of 2018. I currently work at a law firm. I have yet to take the LSAT but plan to do so in June, 2017.
My biggest worry about my application is my LSAT sc…
@Q.E.D Agreed. Get into analytic philosophy, people. It may be leaps and bounds ahead of the LSAT (and in many cases not necessary), but it sure is worthwhile.
Two trivial edits:
In the "Activities" section, you have "Business Liaison, Member" for one position and then "Hearing Board Member" for another. Why does one have a comma indicating your position and the other doesn't? It might be something that's…
I'm 23 yrs old and graduated from college in May 2015. I plan on attending law school in the fall of 2018. I currently work at a law firm. I have yet to take the LSAT but plan to do so in June, 2017.
My biggest worry about my application is my LSAT…
The line of reasoning you're employing with regards to when a statement logically addresses another is valid. For example "not all" statements ("not all dogs have fur") are not refuted by "some" statements ("X dog has fur"). But, the difference here…
No, don't presume that because an answer choice contains "some/most/many/few" that it is more likely wrong than right. It's not necessarily true. Why should you lean towards thinking it's right or wrong when in fact it may not be? You're taking supe…
@Pacifico said:
Switching to 25 in 25 for LR
Does this strategy not include questions skipped? In other words, do you get through all 25 questions in 25 minutes with all done more or less?
As someone who has been through Testmasters already, personally, I must say that 7sage is the way to go. I sent you a message with more details, check your inbox.
@Addistotle said:
PTs have happened after 38km of hard riding and and 8hr work day
Just wondering, do you think you benefit much by taking PTs at the end of the day as opposed to closer to the time you would be taking the actual test?
I've steered clear of the 70s, save for one or two, to save them until up to my September test day and since I'm still having problems in the 50s - 60s, but it kind of sounds like it would be a better idea to at least familiarize myself with them ea…
Agreed with @quinnxzhang I've always learned that to take A –> B and A –> C and draw the conclusion B some C, you must assume that there is at least 1 member in A. However, I can't say entirely why the assumption of at least 1 is used for this…
Just wondering, for those right on the edge between being prepared and not, isn't there some value in taking the test for the sake of some test day experience?
I think one reason is because there are only so many different ways to test the same concept, and another reason is because it gives the test some stability. If you think about it, the test writers have to know how people will generally perform befo…
Be wary of the simple one-size-fits-all answers people (myself included) tend to give on discussion forums. In reality nobody knows your particular situation but yourself and any advice will depend on some degree of speculation.
I don't know what …
@hmccabe1214 said:
schools / LSAC rarely even take into account the personal statement or hardships, etc.
Where did you hear that? I've visited several schools and spoken to many admissions committee members and the overwhelming impression I've ha…