@danielznelson I made a second 7sage account to track my "new" test scores so I could cross-reference the questions I had previously missed and see if I started getting them right.
And, to be equally cheeky, the line of arguments I presented to you are in line with what the state of California argued.. and won. So, in a way, you kind of have been presented the arguments of a "real lawyer," just coming from a different vessel.
One additional comment which you can choose to read or not, the problem you point out of disclosing disability on the application is fundamentally different from the transcription notation. The former gives the individual freedom to disclose informa…
@royaimani I recognize that LSAC's process is by no means perfect. Yet, I still firmly believe that the use of the notation would be more harmful than beneficial. There are always going to be people who have the resources to game the system and I ha…
I agree with @"Allison M" in that condensing the difficult conditional statements into "if then" statements or drawing the "if then" statements out like (A --> can be helpful. For me, I did that less often than taking the time to better understa…
Also @royaimani LSAC requires extensive notification and documentation to prove you need extra accommodations. You can't just say, "hi, I have depression, can I get more time?" (not to trivialize depression). It's extremely difficult to pass through…
Hi @jamesjentucker! How do you do on other assumption questions? I ask because sufficient assumptions, I believe, are supposed to be the easier form of assumption questions so I'm wondering if there's some conceptual misunderstanding taking place (d…
@emli1000 I just refreshed LSAC a hundred times. This is elementary school all over again! (I used to fall for the whole "gullible really isn't in the dictionary" joke EVERY. TIME)
Hey @Mitzyyyy, in a 25/26 LR section, I'll use lawgic maybe like 2/3 times. I use it when I don't have a 100% understanding of the stimulus for MBT/MSS questions (common when there are a lot of trigger words or term shifts). I use it briefly to map …
The use of lawgic really depends on what question type you're answering. Typically, people write down the lawgic for MBT and MSS question types. It's also helpful to at least draw the logical structure for PF and parallel question types.
lol k that's what I thought but then I wondered if I was not familiar with some new hip LSAT lingo and freaked out.
My god LSAT, what have you done to me!