Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
brigitte
About
- Username
- brigitte
- Joined
- Visits
- 683
- Last Active
- Roles
- Member
Comments
-
How did you think your interview went? Could you have come off as arrogant or "weird"?
-
@jkatz1488 said: We need to distinguish conditional statements from the conditions provided and their results. Conditional statements provide a map of meaning which we can use to determine inferences if we are given relevant conditions. No mat…
-
@anonclsstudent said: @acsimon said: @anonclsstudent said: I agree that Amy Wax's comments were not appropriate and she clearly seems to harbor racist feelings. However, I don't know if what she said is actually f…
-
@acsimon said: @anonclsstudent said: I agree that Amy Wax's comments were not appropriate and she clearly seems to harbor racist feelings. However, I don't know if what she said is actually false. In fact, there has been research d…
-
I agree that Amy Wax's comments were not appropriate and she clearly seems to harbor racist feelings. However, I don't know if what she said is actually false. In fact, there has been research done on the issue, not specific to Penn, but to law scho…
-
@uhinberg said: This boils down to LG not being a science. It often hits me to do games differently the second, third, or fourth time through. In the conditional sequencing game in PT 83,- JY decided not to split, but in an almost exactly …
-
Wow! What have you heard?
-
Bump
-
@"Cant Get Right" said: @anonclsstudent said: I don't remember if the CC covers an issue related to this, but there is often an implied "all" before sentences that begin with a plural verb. "Police officers should uphold the law." …
-
@akistotle said: @anonclsstudent said: The author of the passage provided Nicaraguan pines as an example of a forest produced in part through controlled burning. The author does not think the pines were produced by natural fires. S…
-
@Sami said: @anonclsstudent said: Is there any rule of the English language that allows us to tell when the claim "As are B" means every single A is a B, and when "As are B" is a generalization that means only that some or most As …
-
@"Seeking Perfection" said: @10000019 said: @goingfor99th said: @Sammie215 said: I’m in a very similar boat.... If you can think of a trusted friend/parent/mentor who could serve as an edit…
-
@CocoZhang said: I decided to take the LSAT in 2014, third year of college. I purchased some popular LSAT prep books and read them throughout my summer while doing physics research on campus. Did some PTs and took the September 2014 test. Knew…
-
@"Mitchell-1" said: @oberdysz said: I'm not dissing on people with disabilities... only the ones who fake it. And anxiety can be very fake-able...don't you think. I'm 100% behind honest disability suffering testers to get accom…
-
@"J.Y. Ping" said: Hey guys, I just posted a new video for PT 32, Game 2. It's a difficult in/out game that can be made easier with a better game board. Have a look! Given how much weight YouTube places on likes/dislikes, would you g…
-
We want to keep F and H apart at all times. Adding a rule that says whenever I is not in a Group, it must have G, would do exactly that. If you don't put I in the group, then the group can only have G + F/H. And, if you DO put I in the group, the gr…
-
Another example from the Trainer. "Sarah only dates funny boys." If the intended meaning is that the only people Sarah dates are funny boys then that wording is just point blank wrong. The LSAT would not write that type of sentence, but course auth…
-
I think the reason this is confusing is that it's grammatically incorrect if the intended meaning is "If Work --> Then Tuesday". The LSAT, as far as I know, has NEVER expressed that idea in this fashion. It's not truly ambiguous -- the actual mea…
-
Bump. Thank you for any opinions.
-
bumping. Thank you for any thoughts on this problem.
-
@BinghamtonDave said: I gave this some thought, I think you have a solid point, this might be something you want to reach out to the LSAC about. I have heard of them answering questions. Please keep me posted on when/if they respond to your …
-
@danielznelson said: I think what @TheLSAT is trying to communicate is that, for the purpose of the LSAT (due to the specific language of LSAC), "exclusive or" will always lead to one or the other, when technically (and this part is outside of…
-
@TheLSAT said: @dcdcdcdcdc The definition of "or" in the exclusive arena does not mean at least one because at least one denotes that you could have more than one. In the exclusive or arena, the definition of the "or" is at most one. However, …
-
@partyondudes said: thanks @"Cant Get Right"! @anonclsstudent do you happen to remember where you saw the approach of working on acceptable situation questions while reading through the rules? @partyondudes you should be able to see this new…
-
any more info about the potential contract with 7sage? mainly, what would you pay per hour for content-creation work?
-
How do you do argument-based questions without identifying the conclusion and the premises? Do you mean that you just don't write them out or note them with pencil, but you do in fact note them in your head? Or that you don't identify the specific a…
-
Thank you. The approaches I mentioned in the original post seem to be new...there was no explanation by JY as to why we were changing things up from prior videos.