Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
c.janson35
About
- Username
- c.janson35
- Joined
- Visits
- 1,908
- Last Active
- Roles
- Inactive Sage, Inactive ⭐
Comments
-
If the money truly isn't an issue then I don't see why you wouldn't register. 7sage is an amazing resource and it can only help you.
-
As long as the burden and tediousness of that doesn't start to weigh you down or kill your motivation to take and review PTs, then go for it. And are you asking if I've taken the SuperPrep tests? I've taken 1 or 2 of them, and it's cool reading LS…
-
Sounds like a solid plan. You'll probably find that you won't need to write explanations for every question after a little while, and that continuing to do so can really make BR feel like a chore. Don't get me wrong, articulating why an answer choic…
-
Manhattan forums are a solid resource. Then again, if you want to engage in conversation about questions that stump you then just post about them here on 7sage! The community here is always willing to help out.
-
Yup we are trying to weaken Lee's argument, which would in turn defend Kim's. Lee is saying that Kim is probably wrong in her theory because people couldn't know their life expectancy was increasing while they were living. The implicit assumption …
-
@bsm45lsat they run anywhere from 2 and a half to 3 hours.
-
@dumbhollywoodactor yea I would say 5 PT of going through that process is probably enough to get on the right track, give or take. After that, the normal PT-BR cycle is what I would do also.
-
I may have a different view than some others, so I thought I would share. I think you should definitely keep going with 2-3 PTs per week as I believe it's the best way to start making gains in your scores. You've been over the core curriculum and th…
-
@brna0714 hmmm idk... On Amazon LSAC doesn't list which test it is (and the do say which other two tests are included), so unless they sneakily label it inside the book and nowhere else it might just remain a mystery!
-
@brna0714 previously undisclosed! Fresh PT material ftw
-
@beyondsudi it doesn't matter how early you apply if your application is burdened by a low score. An application with a higher score submitted a couple months later in the cycle will provide you with a better chance of admission and make you more li…
-
@gia_henry just think of it in terms of using your time most efficiently and productively. Is trudging through LSAT material at half capacity every day as effective as taking a couple of days off and returning to the material rejuvenated and ready t…
-
@Gia_Henry don't be afraid to take some days off! A good break may be really beneficial to your studies and your PT scores, and you may even find after a couple days without the LSAT that you miss it and want to do more! Also, once you start taking …
-
It definitely is frustrating to not see that progress right away, but it's a process. You can't get better at PT without taking PT, so give a few more a go! You'll start to develop a feel for them after a while. Going through the curriculum is the e…
-
Your interpretation of premise 2 might be where you are getting caught up. Nowhere does it say "increasing demand causes increased gasoline prices." This is not logically the same as "as a result of the increasing demand, the price of gas has risen …
-
If the consumer advocate were talking generally, then the sentence would read "there is no doubt that governments are responsible for increased fuel costs," but instead, and I'll add emphasis, the author writes "there is no doubt that THE government…
-
Well, what you are implying is that the consumer advocate issues a general principle about gas price increases, when in fact he/she does not. The consumer advocate is making an observation about the increased price of gasoline in Country X (that bei…
-
This is a tough one to eliminate. If you take the negation of C, it says: "consumer demand for gas can sometimes increase without causing gas prices to rise." If you think about it, this does not have to be true for the argument to hold. We know f…
-
@jaredj229 on your LSAC account you choose which letters you want to assign to which applications. Also, when submitting the request electronically to your recommenders, you can label each of them in order to keep track of which letter is which
-
A general letter written specifically is always better than a specific/targeted letter written generally. As long as your reccommender can honestly and meaningfully speak to your strengths you'll be good!
-
Awesome, glad I could help!
-
Well if the critics are acknowledging something, then they are "admitting something to be true." The way the sentence is written is to imply that the critics are conceding the fact that there is tremendous public support. They are against public fun…
-
The key to this question is really the last sentence, and it is important that we understand exactly what it is saying. "If the critics were right about this," (this referring to their idea of what must be true for the project to be justified), "the…
-
It seems like you're arbitrarily placing a huge time constraint on yourself when you can just delay the test to (at least) December. I would definitely consider that option before you freak out and choose option 1 or 2. When you start studying you'l…
-
This is a MSS question type, so we are looking for an answer that has a high level of support. The 4 incorrect answer choices will likely have absolutely no support. This is helpful for us because we can quickly eliminate these unsupported AC. The…
-
I would echo what @Pacifico said; continually drilling sets of 25 of the same question is not the best way to study because it is not an accurate representation of the test. Also, an LR section weaves itself in and out of difficult/convoluted materi…
-
Looks good to me! I would do as many PT as possible, combined with really solid BRs, until the test date. If you've been through the curriculum and the trainer already, it's time to get down to business and just PT. Once you build up some solid anal…
-
Keep practicing! Your timing will improve in RC with practice!
-
The flaw lies in assuming that there will be no applicants for the job just because Josh wants it the most and is still not applying. The job could be very attractive to a lot of people, Josh in particular because he may have been working his whole …
-
This a a serious case of term-flipping. All of the premises talk about novels whereas the conclusion is about books. 25 films in Z were based on novels and the conclusion states, of the 100 films in 1992, no more than 25 of them were based on books.…