Don't give up. Identify your problem areas and design specific strategies to fit the. Increase the depth of your review. If you've seen nearly every test, I'll tell you right now, unless you've been prepping for like two years, there is no way you…
I have 7 takes, and did fine. If there is any negative effect of a third (fourth, fifth, etc.) score, it is by far outweighed by the impact of it being a higher score.
Brad is an awesome guy with a great story. I was super fortunate to connect with him this past year, and having a fellow veteran (of the same unit!) of such quality ahead of me in the cycle to bounce ideas off of was instrumental in my own success.…
/P ←s→ beliefs
P → /beliefs
Some things that aren't Jedi use the force
So, Jedis can't use the force
/Art ←s→ aesthetics
Art → /aesthetics
and none of the others match... thats how I remember doing this one anyway. It's a dumb argument which i…
@FindingSage said:
I remember seeing someone with a 4.0/ 3.8 that didn't get a penny for scholarship money to T-14, people with mid and high 170 scores with zero offers or only offers from safety schools.
Concur with everything else but yeah…
@jasmine567 said:
Would it be worth my time to do thorough review...
Meaning you're not doing it now? If so, then this is likely the single best thing you can start doing.
@"Burden.of.Floof" The "not" in "some are not" is arbitrary. X←s→/Y could mean the same thing as X←s→Z (or ❤️, or ♤, or △, or 🍆) if we decide it to be so. In other words, you made those two statements equivalent by applying the same variable. But…
Enough to make you confident that on a bad day you will still come back with a score in your target range... especially if you tend to experience a test day penalty or testing/performance anxiety. You need data that provides both indication of consi…
@"Burden.of.Floof"
Q's response serves to counter any use by M of the evidence about 85 to 90 year olds own support of which one of the following hypotheses?
Q's response serves to counters any use by M of the evidence about 85 to 90 year olds…
Yes it's fine. If it just makes it more likely, or contributes to wages not rising, in other words reconciling the paradox, it's likely not the right answer as we're looking for something that does this the least. Note that if this were a more diffi…
It's not an argument. You are given seemingly conflicting premises and tasked with identifying 4 answers that would work toward reconciling them and one that does not.
B says (they did something) designed to keep more abled bodied adults around.
…
Keep asking "why?" until you have something specific enough that you can design a strategy to remediate, with precise benchmarks. The more specific you get, the more likely your efforts will be productive. Just saying "didn't read carefully" as you…
@"Lime Green Dot" said:
Can we take this a step further and say that because (A) is necessary for the content of para. 2 about the BBO to make sense, is it thereby inferable? In other words, the negation of (A) would render para. 2 p…
Disturbed asbestos bad
removal disturbs asbestos
So don't require removal.
Strengthen
A - Asbestos less risky than smoking drugs, booze, diet, being lazy, nuclear bombs, sharks with lasers, telling your wife to calm down, gas station sushi... no…
@"Lime Green Dot" said:
..."strongly implied" rather than the "explicitly stated" side. But I just didn't feel that (A) passed the minimum threshold of being "strongly implied" for the reasons I mentioned.
Remember these are our constructs w…
But I just don't see how lines 19-22 really give us the textual support we need to opt for this latter interpretation.
Mm... keep hammering this out I guess since its a good exercise, and hopefully Kevin can give a different perspective, but IM…
Concur with Kevin, but I'd also suggest that even under the offending interpretation, in other words, either way you read it, (A) is still absolutely correct because the stem asks for the one that is "the most clearly inferred," as opposed to "clear…
@axbSunDev said:
@canihazJD said:
Inline translation practice, translation drills (including The Memory Method for Improving LSAT Reading Comprehension, and confidence drills. For LG you really do need to just nuke from orbit (its …
@LSATcantwin said:
Just here to second this advice. Back when I took the test like 4 years ago I was eager to see people post questions. So I could test my understanding of it. Could I explain it? Was I too lost? - sometimes I didn’t even post…
@Ashley25 said:
Agh, I thought the argument was causal, like the London Pianists influenced Continental (European) musicians and the example with Beethoven and the Broadwood Piano was meant to highlight that relationship
Thanks for respon…
I believe this is the most recent discussion on this. Also make sure you are solid on the CC lesson.
https://classic.7sage.com/discussion/#/discussion/comment/178995
Yes, check out the RC explanations for the newer PTs. It doesn't happen immediately, but soon after the introduction of the comparative passages, the videos switch to doing the questions one passage at a time. Great strategy, and works well for poin…
Review everything that gave you problems, articulate the specific reason why you lost each point, design a strategy to address each individual issue, apply strategy, retest, repeat.
Inline translation practice, translation drills (including The Memory Method for Improving LSAT Reading Comprehension, and confidence drills. For LG you really do need to just nuke from orbit (its the only way to be sure) and get as many games under…