Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
canihazJD
About
- Username
- canihazJD
- Joined
- Visits
- 4,040
- Last Active
- Roles
- Member, Sage, ⭐
Comments
-
Probably YP. Is this school for scholly leverage? If so you're likely in the awkward position of them wanting to be convinced you'll actually matriculate when you have no intention of doing so.
-
@"ashley.tien" said: hm. I don't know. I just have a hard time seeing that because L doesn't mention HT treatments at all. No, you're right. That's why A is wrong... L is not doing that. L offers no opinion of the relevancy of what S is sayi…
-
Ugh Elieen Gray and woodland clearings... this PT was one of my low outliers in part because of RC. https://i.imgur.com/dsk0G4C.png Just do a good review afterward. As long as you adequately articulate to yourself what caused you to do poorly and…
-
A. is saying L is attacking the relevancy of access to high tech treatments with regard to which system is better. If this were the case L wouldn't just be arguing that denial of basic care is worse, but that rationing of high tech treatments shoul…
-
That's it. L is basically saying access isn't only about high tech treatments.
-
Focus on speed/flow through games. Just like the rest of the sections, the time you bank at for another round at the end is where you pick up those last points.
-
I would say no. The hold til Feb is standard for them if you weren't a hard no, but also didn't look great to solidify target medians... actually pretty standard in general, but they just come out and say it and give you a timeframe instead of leavi…
-
The argument is that if parents are given the ability to pick schools, academically underachieving schools will be forced to improve their academic offerings. Assumption: academics are the criteria parents would use to pick a school A. is necessar…
-
@"ashley.tien" said: So is this the correct way to think about it? Let’s say the Dino is related to the T.Rex: perhaps its features were still developed to accommodate its large size and bulk (if it were not fully grown) and same can go if the…
-
Premise: We found a dino with TRex features but 1/5 its size. Conclusion: So, the belief that TRex features were necessary to accommodate its size must be abandoned. D is incorrect because it will not help you evaluate this argument regardless of …
-
@"ashley.tien" said: So the conclusion is that the pups probably didn't accompany adults while they were hunting and scavenging because none of the bones in the tar pits came from pups under six months old. The gap in the argument is the …
-
IMO a timed run, BR, and review gives you the benefits of just doing an untimed section, plus more. If you just do an untimed run, you miss the experience of exposure to new material under realistic conditions, and you miss the ability to differenti…
-
Timed PT + Blind Review + in depth review of anything that gave you issues. That final step is where all your missing points and extra time comes from. I wouldn't even call BR a review... it's just an extra shot at the test without the constraint of…
-
Destroying the argument doesn't mean to render the conclusion impossible. It means that the conclusion no longer follows from the premises. When negating D to check, it's fine that it's still possible, or even that the conclusion might end up being…
-
@"ashley.tien" said: E.) read new horror novel---m--- disturbing disturb-----> vivid imagination vivid imagination ---m--- disturbing Yeah, isn't this an illegal reversal of a most statement? is this diagrammed correctly? the co…
-
No way to tell at this point. Would depend on the success of vaccinations among many other things. No matter what, they'll eventually have to figure out some way to vet experimental sections.
-
D. is necessary. D. negated "destroys" the argument. Only adult fossils in tar pits. pups probably didn't accompany adults scavenging or hunting. D. gives you a reason to even mention let alone conclude hunting/scavenging. D. negated gives you…
-
I think the issue is what you think the effect of the negation is on the argument. If I thought when negated, it said: when the dire wolves were trapped happen in the tar pits, it did not most frequently when they were hunting and scavengi…
-
It's wrong because it goes from talking about (people who read the novel) to (people who have a vivid imagination), instead of (all people) like D. It is flawed but in a different way - shifts from subset to subset.
-
B. If they did not assume the Mayor believed the park would bring more business than the highway, there is no grounds to conclude there are other interests at play. Say the mayor believes that the highway would bring in twice the business? C. othe…
-
The flaw is a change in domain from subset (just times when you get change) to superset (anytime) When I get change the machine usually squeaks (just times when you get change) If it squeaks then its on so the machine is usually on. (anyti…
-
most often is fine... so "when direwolves got trapped in the pits it they were most often hunting/scavenging." When they got trapped in the pits they were usually hunting/scavenging. Maybe sometimes they didn't... like maybe they got spooked by so…
-
D. The entrapment of direwolves in the tar pits most frequently occurred when those animals were scavenging or hunting. When they got trapped, it was typically when they were hunting/scavenging. If this wasn't so, saying pups didn't go hunting…
-
@lexxx745 said: a 164 diagnostic is nuts lol This. I'd be interested to know if you feel anything predisposed you to that high a diagnostic. Awesome achievement nonetheless.
-
Yes. Most frequently, most often, mostly, more often than not, etc. So if entrapment happened mostly when they weren't hunting, you'd have no reason to conclude pups didn't go hunting based on the lack of fossils. 89.2.7 for anyone else wanting t…
-
Yeah, you need to adjust your approach here. One week later they began sending everyone home because of the pandemic. Irrelevant. Maybe I made a mistake but I don't think this should be one that haunts me into law school. Wrong attitude.…
-
In a poll of 125 CEOs the majority claimed employee training and welfare is of the same high priority as customer satisfaction. So the belief that top management of large corps behave indifferently to the needs of employees is unfounded. So... Mo…
-
@emmorens said: Ok so I am very proficient at identifying these errors in conditional logic, however when they are in abstract terms in the flaw questions it slows me down because I get a little unsure. I just took PT 64 and was stuck on …
-
You’re on the right track. As far as speed, try simplifying more. My thought process would be: Winter: coldest water at the top Summer: coldest water at the bottom Temp switch occurs in fall and late winter Trout are found in coldest water. I…
-
Concur with @"LOWERCASE EVERYTHING". Your primary concern should be taking the test at the time that facilitates your best performance. But from a volume perspective, I've taken all my Flex tests in what would be late afternoon EST and have experi…