@Ashley2018 yes! This is just going to be an unedited information dump so apologies in advance.
Overall atmosphere/students - Obviously any comparisons here are based on secondhand knowledge of other schools but my impression is that Cornell is amo…
@WinningHere Its literally in the stem. Which of the following if true MOST weakens, strengthens, etc. You have to evaluate each answer choice in relation to the others. The most ridiculous answer you've ever heard of will be correct if the others …
You never attack a premise. Always accept them as true. You are trying to make the conclusion less (or for strengthening, more) likely to follow from the premises, by affecting the relationship between the two. Remember that it is a comparative se…
Practice translation of your stimulus (or really anything you read on the test)
Look for something that intuitively must be true
When in doubt, negate the answer
Practice negating answers
I think the first and last points are the most important …
IMO you're going to be sitting there thinking about it anyway, so its not like youre saving significant time if any at all.
Its much more common, especially early on to say, "if I'd have drawn that out I might have gotten it right" as opposed to "d…
@Ashley2018 said:
@agc438 said:
@Ashley2018 said:
If law schools aren't going to admit anyone after December, then what's the point of them having the deadline be until January/February?
Uh...... I d…
@"Jonathan Wang" said:
I was like 4 drinks in. In fact, disclosure: I was not completely sober.
Drunk LSAT explanations = best LSAT explanations.
LMAO maybe for entertainment. I'm not even sure what I said and I sure as hell …
@"Cant Get Right" said:
Y'all starting on jurisdiction or FRCP?
FRCP primarily but we started off with Sibbach and I feel like I never caught up. This guy seems to be pretty notorious here... @"Lucas Carter" is the only 2L who doesn't just l…
@lsat_sus Ugh... make that video for a limited time only access please. I was like 4 drinks in. In fact, disclosure: I was not completely sober. Civ pro has me all fucked up.
Also...
...who's agreed to bestow his infinitesimal LSAT wisdom..."
…
They will see every score, and most schools will say they "consider" them all, but it is largely in an admissions office's interests to treat you as your highest score.
Just asking "How'd I get this wrong?" can be unproductively vague for a lot of people. Sometimes it can help to give yourself some prompts to respond to, at least initially. For instance:
What was my translation/understanding of the stimulus dur…
@"Lime Green Dot"
I still see a distinction between a possibility gap and an absolute gap. I feel (E) is an example of the former. Just wanted to ask you whether "may no longer follow" from the premise (possibility gap) implies "no longer follow…
the LSAT once again just for personal reasons
This is technically not allowed. Right before the exam you affirm that you are taking the test for the sole purpose of gaining admission to law school.
That said, as someone eyeballs deep in 1L... …
Whichever can write the stronger, more meaningful letter. Potentially one that will let you see the letter and suggest edits, or at least be open to your suggestions.
@"Cant Get Right" I'm finishing Getting to Maybe just in time as week 1 assignments are up and apparently I'll never have recreational reading time again.
If you can score well on the GRE, have a good GPA, no official LSAT score, and it won't preclude you from applying someplace you want to attend, I'd go GRE. Otherwise do the LSAT. GRE scores dont have to be reported, so benefit seems to go to those …
Timing required its own specific work and strategies. You have to practice it. Here's a good starting point.
https://classic.7sage.com/why-you-have-to-skip-questions-on-the-lsat/
https://classic.7sage.com/webinar/skip-it/