Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
goingfor99th
About
- Username
- goingfor99th
- Joined
- Visits
- 1,513
- Last Active
- Roles
- Member
Comments
-
I'm getting nervous af.
-
Expect the worst, hope for the best.
-
I think I remember all the rules, but I can't share. Soon, you'll know.
-
@Kewlaidd said: Guys are we allowed to ask about the rules for the M/S/T game? Not inferences, I just cant seem to remember the rules/game itself and i'm trying desperately to recreate it in hopes of seeing if i got a question right. I kno…
-
Do you skip questions that give you trouble after a certain amount of time, or do you hyperfocus until you are able to select an answer, regardless of how unsure you feel about your selection? The key to timing is being able to pry yourself away fro…
-
Speed is a function of accuracy. If you want to get faster at RC, you do so by becoming more accurate. Do a lot of untimed RC passages, and don't move on from them until you're sure you've highlighted the source of/justified every single correct ans…
-
Don't worry about timing yourself for a while, either. When I started on logic games, I didn't time myself until I started to gain confidence in my approach. I found the timer, even if it was just running time and not a countdown, was counterproduct…
-
mreehh
-
A lot of times I will come back from a break and score much higher much more consistently than I was before I took my break. A break can be a couple days or a couple weeks, or anywhere in between. I actually didn't look at much LSAT material in the…
-
@dennisgerrard said: Depend on your stage. If you have exposed to different types and want to drill certain type, it's fine to drill some LGs for early games. Yet, I suggest you to drill timed section to strengthen your pace regardless of LG t…
-
@goingfor99th said: Yeah, good addition. Should perhaps sort some newer games by type, too, if not already on the way.
-
Yeah, good addition.
-
@"Cant Get Right" said: The LSAT uses Aristotelian Logic, not Boolean, and assumes that all terms referred to exist. This argument is invalid according to Boolean logic, and conditionally valid according to Aristotelian. Since we use Aristotel…
-
@"Gary NYC" said: That was the easiest logic games ever, but the LR an RC were difficult. Usually I do really good on LG, so I was hoping that LG would be harder and RC and LR easier since I always get a perf score on LG. But nope! How much…
-
Are you saying that it's possible that there are no non-As that are also non-Bs, or, in other words, that there are no non-Cs?
-
I'm not sure what the question bank is, but it's probably similar to the Cambridge LSAT packets, which contain all LG from the first 38 tests sorted by type. I ran through those LG packets in their entirety 3 times before I even touched a timed sect…
-
I think I answered that nuclear reactor steam/heavy isotope question correctly. Other than that marsh clearing question, that was my most uncertain selection. Yippppeeee!
-
It is a conceptually tricky argument form, though, to be fair. It doesn't seem to follow at first glance, but it does.
-
It is logically valid. I think you may have misread the original post, @roychess.
-
I erase frequently when I have multiple universes and have already exhausted a large portion of the game. Erasing isn't always appropriate but sometimes it's optimal; the trick is knowing the difference.
-
I've definitely noticed something similar to the things you two are describing.
-
@"nessa.k13.0" said: @theLSATdreamer said: @LSATiscoming sadly im in the same boat three LR sections and I can only recall one about fire 400,000 years ago. Lol Same here with 3LR sections. The fire 400,000 yrs ago Europe o…
-
73 and 74
-
@"Alex Divine" said: @"Cant Get Right" said: I had one where I took the LSAT twice before I was ready:/ Now that would be what I considered a nightmare. Or worse, having never found 7Sage and still be studying using only th…
-
@theLSATdreamer said: @goingfor99th damn it I was hoping for at least 25$ the watch was helpful i suppose i can use it to live my life 53min at a time I'm only teasing. You may be able to get more. Not much more, though. Better to just kee…
-
@theLSATdreamer said: btw i have allof thelsats from 1- 70 and the mastermind watch, how much do you guys think i can get for it online? lol $20
-
I've had dreams about the LSAT. Usually I'm frantically trying to improvise a logic game for whatever is happening in the dream. Some of these dreams seem more like nightmares lol.
-
@"surfy surf" said: I had 2 RC sections, 2 LR, and 1 LG (in that order from what I recall). In my last LR, I noticed a sort of grammatical error in one of the questions towards the end (maybe around #17 or so). I don't remember the exact p…
-
I thought it was a playground, not an amusement park? I may be wrong.
-
@tfatherree said: Did anyone feel like this was (as far as the LSAT goes) an unusually straightforward, if not overtly soft test? RC was moderately difficult, for sure, but not the hardest I've done and easily the hardest section in the test.…