Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
iiiSpoon
About
- Username
- iiiSpoon
- Joined
- Visits
- 507
- Last Active
- Roles
- Inactive ⭐
Comments
-
Hey Accounts Playable, the journalist argues that only 26 percent would join the education political party while only 16 percent would fund it; because evidence shows that a party has at least 30 percent eligible voters prepared to support it by eit…
-
Hey nordeend, I think assuming A always causes B and B always causes C, you can.
-
Hey DHA, here's Jonathon's timed LR section: I don't know how well this will help since most of the thought process behind LR questions is in the mind, as evident by how clean Jonathon's test is.
-
Hey guitarnara, one thing I noticed when completing the core curriculum was that my logic per question type was fine, and answering sets of each was not an issue. But when they were mixed and my brain had to switch between strengthening to weakening…
-
I'm so jelly. . .But congrats!!!
-
First off, don't fall into the 'what if' scenario because the question will always give you a clear situation. PT74-1-14 scenario is the aftermath of a collision of a satellite with another satellite/fragments. This leads into the support which tal…
-
Going to restructure this whole lawgic to what is essential: P(rss) using bracket because I'm showing that the only way to be P is to be RSS _______ H>P If we know P is therefore RSS, then to be P, H must be RSS. And that's it. That is all that …
-
This is getting more and more confusing but I think if you want to map it out it would simply be P(HE) > RSS > ~E Therefore HE > P > RSS > ~E We know from the conclusion that HE is P and that HE is not ~E, so all that is left to say…
-
My sandal is nothing but rubber. Therefore, rubber is a sandal?
-
Yes. The answer choice will state subsidiary conclusion or something of that manner.
-
'Nothing but an attempt' = Propaganda is a repetition of simplistic slogans, and that's it, so we need not draw other arrows from P. That does not mean therefore simplistic slogans is propaganda. Ie, I use simplistic slogans because I can, since I'm…
-
There is only one conclusion. The fact both C and E label their picked sentence as THE conclusion should have made you kick E to the curb, since you already correctly identified with the last sentence as THE conclusion.
-
If you are not a fruit, you are not an orange. If you are not a fruit, you are not an apple. Some things that are not oranges are not apples, ie Darth Vader.
-
OR read for free by using Google chrome's incognito mode (not sure if it works for every browsers' incognito mode ie firefox); every time you max out how many articles you can read, close the browser, restart a new incognito mode and start over agai…
-
In my experience, it is up to the test centre. I clearly heard from the back of my test room some person opening a soda can (that loud click, then PSST) and no one went to tell him/her off; unless I'm living in the past, I'm pretty sure clear soda c…
-
@leeginnyy, the first two are spot on, but for the third conditional statement A -> (B->C) = A and not B -> C, the contrapositive should be (B and not C) > not A since your embedded necessary condition is (B > C). If A exists then …
-
@shinny117 another way to think of not(A>B) would be "you can have A and not B." So not(-A>B) would be "you can have not A and not B." (-A>B) is just an "or relation" in which "one must always be in." Saying nope to this would be "you don'…
-
I see why you had a mental breakdown for the first section; I nearly had one myself. That second game was weird.
-
Well, I'm about to write the PT39 so I'll let you know if I breakdown in a couple of hours.
-
I was in the same position as you, tanes25, in that I had gone through the entire syllabus once, but for various reasons stopped and then started once again. Personally, because I felt I had rushed the syllabus before, I chose to redo the entire les…
-
JYPing discusses it in length under advanced logic such as 'or but not both' relations.
-
I think it is mentioned by JYPing that for any type of question, one should figure it out themselves first, so they can build the capacity to handle those question types, before accessing the 7sage explanations. Does it work? Yes, it very much does.
-
I had access to online courses through Kaplan's textbooks, and Al's comment pretty much sums my experience with them, especially with their reading comprehension strategy.
-
The LSAT only allows three attempts per 2 year period...what happens if we go over the 3 attempts? or is there a way to withdraw one attempt post written?
-
PT 71 LG seems a joke compared to the Feb's section.
-
Yes you can think of "few cowards fail to be fools" as some cowards are fools, and here is why. If you have a bucket of A's, and you decide to take a scoop and scoop out some of them and say these are not A's, effectively what is left in the bucket…
-
Depends on how badly you want your LSAT done. You still have two weeks to prep for it. Do you understand HOW to do the questions (that is, what is the strategy for tackling a NA question for example) and why you were wrong, or were you simply brain …
-
Do you have a comparison with respect to specific sections? I have found that some of the older RC passages are incredibly difficult such as the one regarding Lamarck's Theory of Acquisition and the Meyerson Legal Studies. One is in 1999 and the oth…
-
This question is rather tricky but I think I understand the reason behind A well enough to hopefully give you an answer. We are told that the large population of cattle must keep growing in order to keep up with demand; seems like context, and I th…
-
If you are feeling mentality exhausted for the whole day, not just during the latter half of the test, your exhaustion might be your brain pleading for recuperation. If your brain becomes exhausted during the test, then its just a matter of getting …