I'm not entirely sure what you are asking.
@"joy.pyles" said:
Can any of this be used in connection to relative ordering?
but when I go to the practice test, there is always something different or improvised that causes me to freak out.
…
@JustDoIt said:
I agree with @tanes256.
Once you feel that you have dug as deep as you can, go one level further. There is so much that you can learn from your BR process and by taking a ton of time to thoroughly understand each question
…
Last night in the instructor chat with Jonathan, he made a really strong point which I absolutely agree with. If you are blind reviewing an entire test, and it only takes you 1 hour, you are doing it wrong. Jonathan said he has spent up to 6 hours B…
You should be using formal logic whenever you can. When I first began studying, I would have to bracket the premises and conclusion so I could parse through the argument. Now it's completely intuitive, my mind does this automatically. Once you impro…
Do you think there is a universal approach one should utilize while working through an LR question?
We've talked briefly about pre-phrasing answer choices on discord. How important is pre-phrasing, and what would you do if you were unable to come u…
You would be well served to master these games.
However, mastery of these games is not equal to mastery of all games.
While these games will expose you to some of the toughest questions in the LG section, there still remains a plethora of other nu…
Yes, it's necessary if you want to score well.
I understand at present it's slowing you down because the concept is so foreign. When I first began studying, I would have to bracket the premises and conclusion so I could parse through the argument. …
You can definitely get there by June! If not June, then September! /J--->S
My advice is to study logic games rigorously. Scoring -0 / -2 on games can be achieved through repetition and fool proofing which will translate to a huge bump in your s…
Causal reasoning has an implied temporal relationship. An effect must come after a cause. 'The rain caused the flood'
Conditional is more like a rule that says if we have this, then we have this.
'If it is raining, then we will not go to gym'
The…
It seems like 2months + for a lot of schools. Though I'm not applying this cycle, or haven't taken the LSAT for that matter, 2months + seems to be pattern amongst others. Which is absolutely a ridiculous amount of time to be waiting around to learn …
@Cant Get Right said:
If you run out of time, do you want to run out of time on the questions you are most likely to have gotten wrong or on the ones you are most likely to have gotten correct?
Agreed
@bswise2 said:
I guess not...I see what you're saying. So my issue is that I am taking the "identification" part of the conclusion and making unwarranted assumptions about the repercussions?
The Socratic Method is a beautiful thing.
@bswise2 said:
Considering this is a PSA, we have some wiggle room with the logic, correct?
Yes, we must support our conclusion. Does it add to our conclusion to say we should not treat these children?
@bswise2 said:
To your first question, no. If we are doing everything, then we are teaching ALL children because there is no way to determine which ones will grow up to have chronic nightmares. If there was an absolute conditional (ALL adults suffe…
@bswise2 said:
My issue with C is, by accepting that we must do EVERYTHING (bold statement to begin with, but we are looking for an PSA, which allows for that I guess), then shouldn't we also teach ALL children this technique?
Do you think doing e…
Well, you don't have much time to improve with the test being a month away.
Do you really need to take the Feb test? I would consider holding off until June.
With that being said, I would be non stop drilling LR. Especially questions from my pro…
Yeah man, it's really time consuming. It has taken me anywhere from 30 minutes - 12 hours to blind review a section. This is so very important though. I'm copy and pasting this from JYs explanation in the core curriculum. After you read through this…
Honestly, I would just jump right into the course. If you would like a book to compliment the teachings, check out the LSAT Trainer by Mike Kim. A lot of 7 sagers recommend it. Good luck with your studies and welcome to the community!
How come you are in such a rush to take the LSAT? My advise would be to focus on your GPA and worry about the LSAT later.
It sounds like you are pretty deep in your studies though if you are scoring in the 160s? Is that the case?