when I got my score report back, the writing sample was barely legible. This was because the scan of it pixelated everything and seemed to widen the lines themselves. It would be a painful exercise to read anything in that format. I wouldn't worry a…
I think that would be a waste of precious time. The only sort of previewing I have done was if I was running really, really low on time after the second passage, I'd check passage 4 to see if it has more questions than passage 3, and I'd do passage …
These are basically easy most strongly supported questions. Not only are they strongly supported, but the entire paragraph is leading in the direction of saying the answer choice. Whereas there could be many answers that are strongly supported, thes…
Lol at Dillard's being the example of a professional environment. This guy has the right idea. We all spend so much time studying and stressing; it's good to take a break, troll some people, have some fun. I think we can all learn something from ddr…
I'm usually okay in logic games, some -0s but also some pretty horrendous mistakes. My plan is to go through all the logic games by type untimed, but with a eye on a timer to try to push myself, and then do them all again in their sections. After yo…
It might be worth it to compile a list of the rare game types, so that people can go through them and cover their bases. The following is a partial list I got from Odyssey prep, and it includes some pattern, mapping, and circular games. It might not…
On the real test, LG is on two pages. The left hand side is the rules and the first question. On the right hand side are the rest of the questions. There is an abundance of space on the bottom of both pages. If you are used to writing your rules on …
Firstly, this is not a most strongly supported question. The question asks about the underlying principle of the argument. This is essentially a principle justify question, which is nearly the same thing as a sufficient assumption question. It's mos…
Theoretically, the conclusion is both a necessary and a sufficient assumption for itself. So if you have a question that asks for a necessary or sufficient assumption of the CONCLUSION, then yes, an answer that restates the conclusion would be corre…
I am taking pt 66-72, and retaking all of them to try to learn as much as possible from the newer tests. I have already taken 44-65. My 5 test average is 175(excluding retakes, of course)
Hey, I'm actually retaking now. You two should totally meet up and work together though. You seem to be scoring in the same range, so that will be best for both of you.
I had to double check, but I did not find PT 60 to be especially hard in the LR sections. I only missed one LR question, and 7sage reports them as "medium" LR sections. Pt 59, however, gave me a lot of trouble in the first LR section. I did, however…
Which PT and section? I'm scoring around 170 now, and my last few LR sections have been -0 or -1, but I had a random -8 thrown in. S2 PT 59. Some LR sections are just weird, but I don't think there are that many. It could have also been a function o…
The cool thing about unless is that you don't have to figure out which is the Necessary or the sufficient condition. You just need to pick one of the conditions, negate it, and put the other one as the necessary condition untouched. With your exampl…
My score has ranged from 166 to 171, excluding a baptismal diagnostic. Somewhere JY says that, statistically, your real score will be within 3 points of the average of your last 5 PTs, so I wouldn't worry about that. You have time to bring it up.
Realistically, it is inflated somewhat. I'd take it as an opportunity to learn that you could review better, since you should have gotten a 180 on a test you already took if you truly learned everything you could from that test. Awesome job though!
I probably take longer. realistically, for a 5 section test, it takes 2 hours, 35 minutes. Then you probably take a half hour to an hour break, at least, to clear your head. BR can take any where from 45 minutes if you felt really confident (too con…
Most pens are black.
The negation is as follows:
(it is not the case) that most pens are black. most pens are not black.
Most pens are not black.
The negation is as follows:
(it is not the case) that most pens are not black. Most pens are blac…
anne,
The first uses "only" as a necessary condition indicator:
BH->BE
The second uses "the only" as a sufficient condition indicator:
BH->BE
They are both the same, then, logically. No?
My question, more specifically, is whether the phra…