Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
legal_name
About
- Username
- legal_name
- Joined
- Visits
- 324
- Last Active
- Roles
- Member
Comments
-
@"Cant Get Right" I haven't either so I totally would've believed it. I also managed to predict the one about judicial recuse the night before PT 75 (and a lot of episodes of Good Wife) which sparked the whole idea for this discussion. We grant you…
-
@CalPoliSci Looking forward to writing them, thanks for being so thorough. I'll be watching out for that. Best of luck with your studies as well!
-
@sison.bonifacio Absolutely, I intend on taking most of the 70's by then. Thanks for sharing your take on it. Benefit of your approach is still having a week before the exam to review which sounds pretty reasonable. Assuming you've looked at them, w…
-
Hi @civnetn Could you clarify what about this question is confusing you. Is it the stimulus or the answer choices? I eliminated answer choices B through E because they were contradictory to what the stimulus presented - the language was too extr…
-
@emilycyoung1 "except" should be similar to "unless" implying that you would treat it the same way as explained above (negate sufficient). I don't believe it's specified in the curriculum though, so I would love some back-up on this in case I'm wr…
-
It takes time to get used to thinking this way especially if you don't have a background in philosophy, I've found. I would recommend testing yourself daily with flashcards and trying to apply it to daily life. Breaking down conversations. Or, pausi…
-
@David3389 @daniel.noah.pearlberg I really appreciate you guys taking the time to write out your explanations. I overthought this question completely. I just needed to see someone else break it down the way they saw it. Can't thank you both enou…
-
@daniel.noah.pearlberg I think you mean the opposite - that uprighters did not have free use of their hands and non-uprighters did? I guess my mistake is thinking that having dexterity implies you have free use of hands is a smaller assumption than …
-
@daniel.noah.pearlberg I see where you're going with that and not trying to be difficult here, I swear, haha but isn't free use of hands necessary to develop dexterity? I might've overthought this question.
-
I can't imagine how many hours I've now spent watching JY's explanations, but I can definitely say they've payed off. You need to develop an instinct for the set-up. That comes mainly from solving many games and having the necessary experience in ev…
-
@blah170blah Thanks so much for the encouragement. Just to clarify, do you mean drill with previously written tests or with new ones?
-
That's so inspiring! Congratulations!
-
@MrSamIam I will try that. I can't be the only one struggling with this, right? Thank you again.
-
@MrSamIam thank you so much for your response. Will be sure to do that. Perhaps it's something that could be worked into the curriculum at some point in the future?
-
I'm positive I'm not the only one here who has tried multiple methods. I'm not going to lie and pretend I devoted three years to intense study (seeing as how I was finishing my undergrad in my first year, working several jobs in my second, and only …
-
Hi @"Dillon A. Wright", I would like to be added as well. Thank you kindly!
-
Was hoping to get some clarification on the publishing date. How long does LSAC wait before releasing the test to the public usually?
-
@"Cant Get Right" Ah! Got it. I was on the thought process of some = at least one, but my mistake was that I kept assigning the C's to the B's attached to A which doesn't necessarily have to be the case. Thank you so much.
-
I agree with all of the fantastic comments above. What makes a big difference in RC is active reading. The danger of reading often (in the world beyond LSAT) is that you let certain details slip in larger texts and sacrifice precision of facts for t…
-
Thank you so much to everyone! You guys are incredible. I really appreciate all of your feedback. For some reason I haven't been getting e-mail updates of all of your posts - just saw your responses now. @"Cant Get Right" You nailed it. That would …
-
@"The 180 Bro_OVO" Thank you for the support and sharing. I'll definitely try something like that out. I've written a few PT's a while back before starting here. I guess it still feels a bit rough coming back into it.
-
To be honest, I might just add to the confusion. I find this a really good question. What I tried to do was to re-work the sentence so that it technically meant the same thing but incorporated a group 1 indicator. "People who are not handsome are…