Agreed, ideally most effective is to just copy the LSAT formatting with time. If you cant, i guess second best is to take breaks as you need, because if you dont, your mind wont work as well under that time you arent taking a break. Then again, one …
I think there is no point if you can truly say there is not a SINGLE question you would get right under Blind Review that you got wrong under timed. If it is the case every single one of your answers is the same as blind review, then I dont see the …
I think the all nighter idea is good. you wont be as sharp post all nighter but itll be well worth it to reset your sleeping schedule and also have a great sleep the night of
I think if you were going to take it in June, 4 hours a day of thoughtful engagement with the test is enough for sure to get into the 160s. I started out similar to you and reached the 160s after about 4-5 PTS. It took me about a month to go through…
I think it depends how fast your planning on going through them. If your nearing test date, obviously alternating to get used to the more recent tests is a good idea. If your far away I dont see a problem with working upwards slowly. In fact it migh…
Im originally from California, grew up in San Jose, and went to the University of Minnesota twin cities for undergrad. I think the difference of 3 in ranking means very little. It would depend where youd wanna work. Irvine, or Minnesota? Also, your …
Hm I started in the mid 150s Post CC and my BR score was high 160s. Then once it became low to mid 170s I just started gradually moving up my timed score to the mid-high 160s.
I kinda think any practice that makes it harder (to a point) is good! I feel like if you can do well spending a few extra seconds looking for the phrase that might come in handy during the real thing
Hm, generally they take the highest score anyway so I dont think so? I wouldnt write an addendum either, 5 points still brings you to the high 160s which is great.
To be honest, at the top schools, I think GPA is pretty neccessary. As in, perhaps a 2.1 will exclude you no matter how high your lsat is. But that would only be the case, and even then im not sure, at the very top schools like HYS. Quite a few of t…
With the old tests, its much harder to diagram. After all, the conditional logic is less clear, if there is any. I find the old SA questions to not really need diagraming at all and kind of just use intuition.
Heres what we know:
Premise: Phycisi…
@cooljon525 said:
Sorry if I'm asking a dumb question but just a bit confused here. Since you have your LLM and passed the bar, I'm assuming you already have your JD. So why are you studying for the LSAT?
Also type "7sage predictor" on go…
Reading your comments is so inspirational. If you ever need a partner or tips or a study buddy im here im taking it in March looking for someone to be accountable with.
Currently 165-167 looking for 167-169 on test day by March.
@99thPercentileOrDieTryin said:
Can anyone speak to the notion of GPA cutoffs? i.e. where an admissions board won't even bother with applications below X.XX GPA? I've heard this is a thing and, if so, I may need to work on raising my own GPA…
As someone who the LSAT is not coming to very easily, I would still say that if one 170 scorer takes 1 month to reach it while the other 170 scorer takes years, it seems like the former has a bit more natural talent? Obviously there are so many fact…
is it "ethically" right? thats up to debate
to answer your question, is it "worth it?" 100% if you get extra time your score would 100% improve enough to make it worth the amount of time you have to take to actually get accomodations approved
I believe that is the only option. Honestly, its not bad? Just write down the answers haha you wont have access to the explanations but as long as you just hammer out the games should be good.