Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
natemanwell1
About
- Username
- natemanwell1
- Joined
- Visits
- 118
- Last Active
- Roles
- Member
Comments
-
There are always indicators. Would focus more on understanding the argument so the indicators become clear.
-
what's with the assumption that every relationship is narcissistic
-
That's not really much of a difference-3 or 4 questions is not much of a range. I would worry a lot more about why that high score is a 167-seems like there a couple of question types you don't know how to answer. If you focus on learning that, thenā¦
-
also confused why you would need "near perfect grades" to get into law school. plenty of law schools have a median gpa of 3.5 and below, and plenty of kids with high lsat scores go to the best schools in the country with that gpa.
-
read outside the test.
-
push the date. take it in September. then you'll have 3 months where you can focus on the lsat.
-
yeah, chain the argument. don't take in a month its very early in the cycle and conditional reasoning is the most basic part of lr
-
I'm confused about this question, so if you can post more detail so people can help you effectively that would be great. you mention "passages" so I assume that this question is about reading comp, but I'm nots sure as Weaken/Strengthen/Evaluate queā¦
-
The Sidley Podcast is a great law podcast
-
there's no rule about which is best in general. different times can be helpful for improving different parts of the test
-
figure out the question types. figure out what confused you each time, and if there are patterns with the question types or patterns in what you find difficult about the questions. "curve-breakers" tend to be different for everyone
-
I think a key mistake people make when studying reading comp is just focusing on the test format. The section is a test of reading skills and its reading outside the test where you build those skills. I also think that you should start learning the ā¦
-
it depends. sometimes its good to go slow and sometimes its good to go fast. its better to mix things up
-
its early in the cycle so there's no need to take
-
start reading a lot before studying specific lsat content. it's essentially a reading test just one section has long reading passages and the other has short passages.
-
no they do not overlap in that way. pointing out a flaw in an argument does not weaken the argument as it as the flaw is already in the argument, so there cannot be any additional weakening from something that is already there. to weaken the argumenā¦
-
don't believe those tests are experimental sections. tests after 99 are not actual prep tests they are tests 7sage made by combining sections from old prep tests to fit into the new non logic games format.
-
Argument: 1) assumption 2) weaken 3) strengthen 4) resolve 5) argument part identification 5) flaw 6)parallel 7) parallel flaw 8) resolve 9) agree/disagree 10) principle supports/find a principle 11) set Reading: 1) main point 2) meaning of somethinā¦
-
not sure what you mean "needs to prepare for June" but going from that to performing well on the lsat in 3 months is a pretty tough challenge. lsat prep is kind of a dual thing where you want to build the fundamental skills outside the test basicallā¦
-
necessary: need for x to happen, sufficient : makes x happen
-
absolutely absolutely would not advise on taking 3 official tests in a year. they cap the amount of takes you have.
-
absolutely not. it doesn't make sense to take any more practice tests without knowing how to do one of the question types. the key with analogy/parallel questions is to chain the argument [e.g. if it is something like "clouds lead to rain" "rain leaā¦
-
no. I don't understand why you wouldn't retake the lsat anyways. quit your job.
-
that doesn't make any sense. how much more important? taking tests doesn't make any sense before you learn the strategies and correct/wrong answer types otherwise you are testing yourself on things you don't know. I also don't know why understandingā¦
-
no. premise is unsupported statement that supports something else. intermediate conclusion is supported by something and supports something else. conclusion is what is supported by the rest of the argument.
-
you have to learn the full technique for solving strengthen questions. step one: know what your intention is [close the gap as much as possible preferably from both sides, or the weaker side, or the stronger side] 2) figure out if any answer choicesā¦
-
yeah so if you have the time to start studying that early I would definitely spend a lot of time building the fundamentals outside the test. the test is essentially mostly a reading test with some logic thrown if. if you have really high reading skiā¦
-
-2 is 100% luck. I think people have this mistaken idea that if their scores fluctuates, it means that they should be scoring at the top end of this range all the time, and they should never score at the bottom of the range. in reality, this idea isā¦
-
got to learn the content. how to answer the question types and, what the wrong answer and right answer types are. doesn't seem like you know them yet so taking more tests rn is pretty worthless tbh
-
yes. it doesn't make sense to take tests without knowing the material on the test.