Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
natemanwell1
About
- Username
- natemanwell1
- Joined
- Visits
- 153
- Last Active
- Roles
- Member
Comments
-
high 160s low 170s are pretty similar more like a good day versus a bad way. think you need to change your perspective on how you are scoring at the moment. if you view the high 160s as being nearly done with mastering the test, your going to leave …
-
it's impossible to assess what is going on without knowing what you're doing for studying, but if you are studying a lot and not seeing any improvement than obviously that method doesn't make any sense. I think a lot of people mistake "studying a lo…
-
there are over a hundred tests that's like twenty tests so not sure what you mean you have ran out. superprep is great. the older tests are harder anyways.
-
tests cluster in terms of similarities in the writing every 5 tests so look at the question types you are getting wrong and see if there is a pattern
-
question types aren't the weakness. it's the more foundational skills. don't just work on science passages, read a lot outside the tests. same thing with arguments. work on identifying the argument parts, not on question types.
-
I've never heard someone use this terminology but I assume you mean "weaken/strengthen/evaluate," even though this would be three different question types. The strategies for weaken and strengthen are the same in RC as in LR. To weaken an argument, …
-
Don't take a diagnostic pt imo one of the absolute worst pieces of LSAT prep advice. that would be like never playing a game of basketball and jumping into a game without knowing anything first. you're better off learning how to solve all the questi…
-
tests tends to cluster together in terms of slight differences in question types for about every 5 tests so sometimes practice tests get worse because of that. but it's not any specific type of prep that is going to raise those practice test scores,…
-
Memorize the techniques for each question. I read all the questions excluding the initial argument or passage and go over the technique for each question before taking the test.
-
There are not two arguments in the question. In fact there is not even an argument that there is a fifth force in the question. We only know that there is a piece of evidence which supports a fifth force, the conclusion is that there is evidence tha…
-
read for an hour every morning, take a practice test and then blind review and score the next day, review the next day, take a day off, repeat
-
yeah I mean you cannot expect that just taking practice tests is gonna move your score up. got to learn all the techniques outside the test. you can read the dragon guide to reading comprehension is pretty solid although there are a lot of spelling …
-
yeah, you gotta to be a lot better at the lsat to get your practice test scores on the live test, even if you get them in practice, need higher understanding
-
the tests tend to come in batches where 5 in a row tend to be similar so you probably improved by getting used to the specifics of several test in a row without fully learning all the concepts
-
it's impossible to say without knowing the schools you're applying to but doesn't seem that feasible to make much of a score increase and im not sure if any schools would care about the difference between a 156 and a couple points higher cause score…
-
never seen these fallacies at least on pretests 1-71 so probably won't be an issue
-
no. it's not about breaking down individual questions. if you just do that you're not going to see any patterns. you need to look at the commonalities of what you get wrong.
-
no. you already knew your initial answer was incorrect and most of the time's there's two clear potential answer choices.
-
counts toward your take total so doesn't really matter but there's a lot more variation in the 160s than in higher score bands especially on a live test where there is more pressure. if you keep the score at least you can use it to apply to some sch…
-
hit me up I'm down scoring 180s on my PTs most of the time now
-
I would do a practice test where you speed read through each passage, then read each passage in order three more times. that will allow you to work on your reading comprehension under speed, and the active recall will help you better remember and un…
-
you probably have certain question types you aren't strong on solving
-
I read the loophole book as well and found it pretty much totally unhelpful. Just learn each question type and the procedure for solving it, and the incorrect answer types.
-
do 5 tests in a row without scoring, then blind review the 5 tests, then do a third blind review. that way you integrate spaced repetition into your prep. write up solutions to each question you get wrong and are unsure about noting the strategy for…
-
studies show that prepping intensely for logic games increases the grey matter in your brain so it will make you smarter and improve your confidence which will help with the other sections
-
means absolutely nothing. taking your first test cold before learning the techniques makes no sense. its like playing a sport knowing none of the techniques-you'll start with a way higher score going in knowing the basics first
-
learn the techniques for solving each type of question and learn all the incorrect answer types
-
I definitely would not burn a third take if you're still scoring in the 150s that's gonna put a lot of pressure on the fourth take which is going to make that take way more difficult and you'll pretty much have to take that test again.
-
yes you can text me