1) Take a minimum of one FULL day off per week (do not think about the test on this day)
2) Take 2 PT's per week
3) Dial back on your drilling if and when you sense burnout creeping in
What are your misses per section? Need to know this to assess p…
@megsvyas said:
I'll join for the next one, and take the PT in advance like I'm supposed to!
It's tomorrow @DumbHollywoodActor is it PT63? I plan to duck in for a bit on the call so I hope to "meet" you soon!
@megsvyas said:
I am going to fully take your advice about 2 PT's a week and taking it in June.
@megsvyas said:
I'm still drilling the LG from 1-35 and I'm noticing many of my shortcomings.
Oh yeah, keep doing this for LG
@megsvyas said:…
@megsvyas said:
planning on taking the Feb test (though I'm not against pushing it to June)
This put me in a good mood to answer your Q.
@megsvyas said:
finished the Ultimate curriculum thoroughly, gone through the Trainer and am currently wor…
@"GSU Hopeful" said:
PTs are too precious to waste. I would say to go through the trainer schedule minus the PTs and save every PT you can for after you finish the 7sage curriculum.
I agree!
@c.janson35 said:
I agree with you, but you are arguing with the premises of the stimulus. It has been conclusively proven that centaurs do not exist.
Actually I was just arguing with your post I'm not actually talking about this Q at all. (And I…
I think I side with @DumbHollywoodActor on this one. How can the existence of anything that supersedes empirical categories be conclusively refuted? Such as ... Santa, unicorns, centaurs, little green men that communicate with me incessantly UNLESS…
@"Accounts Playable" said:
does "demonstrating that there are no centaurs" mean the same thing as "conclusively refuted?"
They don't need to exactly match in terms of the specific reasoning. They just need to have the same exact flaw.
Haha.
This is a pet question for many (most?) of us.
I recommend you watch JY's video for this as it's a very specific flaw that, once you learn it, will never defeat you again.
@shainabarber said:
she insisted I really should read the questions before reading the passage, to increase understanding and to know what I'm looking for.
She is wrong. She is not giving you advice that is relevant to the LSAT.
@Albertoduro1xx said:
I was just wondering whether or not if that was recommended for test takers or if that is just a technique he uses for the videos.
Totes recommend it, as do others such as Mike Kim of the LSAT Trainer.
@guitarnara said:
I "sort of" read the LSAT trainer - mostly LR only.
Haha. Ok. Here's your first assignment. Go to the LSAT Trainer website and get one of the study schedules.
Your job right now is to suck every bit of wisdom from the LSAT Trai…