@"Ron Swanson" said:
A June 2016 exam seems more reasonable and would allow me to take a break from the LSAT and get going next January when my final semester course load is light.
Or maybe October ...
@"Ron Swanson" said:
I don't think I can give the LSAT adequate attention for a round 2 this December while balancing my thesis/other courses this fall.
Agreed
@"Ron Swanson" said:
Based on that, my goal is to attend law school near-free and exit with minimal debt.
Earning some money and putting it away in savings would be an excellent way to defray costs. Things like books, computers, furniture ...
I use the "note" feature to record my original score for retake. For instance, in the note I'll write "6/25 168" so that i know what my original take score was.
Why just one gap year and why not 2? Or 5? Get some serious real-world work experience. You'll be better for it, all around. Thinking outside of the K-JD box is a productive exercise.
@Mitzyyyy said:
What can you get out of the question bank that you cannot get out of the problem sets?
The actual questions! (Displayed in the video plugin)
I'm working on creating a combined schedule that folks can use. Until that's done, you should follow the standard advice, which is to pick one or the other, go through its curriculum, and then do the other one.
@megsvyas said:
then move on to timed PTs with 35+?
Finish the curriculum and then start taking PT's. If scores haven't improved much over diagnostic at that point, post in the forums and we will attempt to diagnose.
@kaytheeh said:
i wanted from them but their PDF downloads sales via their website is no longer active
have you looked at their website recently?
just go ahead and take a peek.
in fact, I'm looking at it right now. looks pretty active to me.
l…
@"J.H. Song" said:
I thought LSAC could have done a better job in scheduling it so that October takers would at least know their results before regular deadline for December.
Nope. They're doing this to make money. So many people take in October …
@profile427 said:
I have to agree with this, especially since I'm not a brah and don't necessarily feel that I have to be "elite" in the brah sense in order to find fulfillment in my career path.
+10 to this
@kaytheeh said:
i thought Cambridge lost it's license to sell PTs? that was true a few months ago, unless its been reinstated.
take a look at their website
@GordonBombay said:
These baby boomers are going to retire eventually, and when you consider that law school applications in general are currently trending downward, it seems reasonable to assume that people who are saying the market is way too ove…