Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
nye8870
About
- Username
- nye8870
- Joined
- Visits
- 1,471
- Last Active
- Roles
- ⭐
Comments
-
Ac(A) is right because it affirms a necessary condition for the conclusion to hold up. What if workers from plant B were eating their nutritious breakfast at home? Then the study proves nothing (plant B did not increase productivity – even WITH a nu…
-
“All bankers are Athletes” translates: Banker --> Athlete. “None of the Lawyers are Banker’ translates: Banker --> /Lawyer. If you are a banker, you are an athlete and you are not a lawyer. Hence ac(C) “Some athletes are not lawyers.” Yes, lik…
-
The main flaw that stuck out for me was that the conclusion is asserting people must be “choosing” – to increase their calcium intake – by eating more cheddar cheese than ice cream. How do we know people are even aware of the calcium levels in eithe…
-
http://classic.7sage.com/lesson/how-to-find-the-sufficient-assumption/ Have you watched this?
-
@amipp170 said: LSAT IS FUN YAS GO LSAT NERDS Have you patented this yet? I'd like to print up some T-shirts.
-
Just read the article about Google Books/Library. I suppose reading one legal article a day would serve rather beneficial for all of us here. Thx @"Accounts Playable"
-
Hey it's better than hearing Donald Trump's voice..."These LSAT writes are idiots! Their questions are a disaster, they don't know what they are doing and I can tell you they are losing in the polls."
-
Hey there @"Accounts Playable" I feel like this plays out more like a necessary assumption question. If you negate ac(A) by saying: "No medieval Arab translators possessed manuscripts of the Homeric epics in their original Greek." Then the theory t…
-
Hey there @babybenny To understand better I changed the scenario from bears to people in Chicago (where I am from). Let's say 1 million people live in the city of Chicago and for eight years a main thoroughfare running in the middle of Lincoln Park …
-
As far as ac(E) is concerned, the argument is not trying to imply that there is any connection between the physical act of putting on clothes and hand warmth. It is saying that the vital organs are kept warm which can keep hands warm. Asserting that…
-
Conclusion: Gloves or mittens are not necessary to keep one’s hands warm in the winter. Combined Premises: By putting on extra layer of clothing --> vital organs warm --> hands warm. The argument fails to consider a scenario (one which we mus…
-
C'mon... you are too kind. Thanks a lot!
-
http://classic.7sage.com/lesson/how-to-weaken-arguments/ Have you watched this yet?
-
@"Accounts Playable" said: why does employment need to increase? (D) there would be a "net" increase in employment... --____ Notice it does not say a "gross" increase. As you questioned, employment need not necessarily increase overall.. just tha…
-
@DumbHollywoodActor said: SPOILER ALERT: My children’s belief in Santa Claus is true even if Santa’s actual existence is not. Ummm...He was just spotted at the DemDebate... so...Yeah. Your kids are correct.
-
Stim says: "Accounts of the epidemic mention the hiccups experienced by -many- victims," is consistent with (B) saying "(not all) of those who are victims of the Ebola virus are afflicted with hiccups." Therefore reasserting this fact does not weake…
-
yes. plus the seals are sharing the food supply, leading to population decrease for cod.
-
2nd Legislator: "balance (such as this) are inappropriate ... ; they have (NO?) place in science." ac-E gives a reason why it does. No balance=inadequate science.
-
(D) is too inclusive. This stim lays out an example which pertains to the fax industry, where compatibility/cooperation among competitors is necessary in order for the that industry to flourish. (D) may not be true for the, let's say, the fast food …
-
(A) says :gov should help fund pure theoretical research "because" *such research might have unforeseen practical applications in fields such as agriculture and medicine*. But Cynthia thinks govs should fund those basic scientific research projects …
-
(B) declares out in the open what the argument is assuming. All of the evidence speaks about #s & %s pertaining to "novels". Then the conclusion goes and broadly claims that those numbers also pertain to "all books" published in Z. So the conclu…
-
@nicole.hopkins said: Where is mine ?? Here y'go! :-)
-
@DumbHollywoodActor I bought a round of drinks, for my friends had just taken the LSAT and were stressing out about the LG section.
-
I am getting tired just reading about your schedule... You are a beast! High gains surely coming your way. Kudos!
-
Perhaps the most handy recall/use of invalid argument forms would be for mapping out a parallel flawed method of reasoning q-type.
-
@nicole.hopkins said: Beastmode. How did you find out the name of my high school battle-of-the-bands group?
-
I agree with you a lot about the assumptions. However, I am just thinking of pollen (A) showing up on a relic found in region (B) and the analysts thinking, "Oh this relic must have passed through region (A) ... when the real story is that the wind …
-
@Pacifico said: The ants crawling on my answer sheet kept me entertained though... Shoulda started humming this....