Yeah @DumbHollywoodActor drew out a really neat graphic during blind review. See, if the river currents rush the dioxin down current (where the fish are not) then it is probably not the cause of the abnormalities.
I look at this NA question as a bridging type. The first statement says ~N --> ~T. The second says ~believes HEGF. Then concludes of "contemporary literature" ~T. So we need to bridge ~Believing HEGF to ~possessing Nobility. AC(d) says ~believe H…
The BR method can seem tedious at first but once you experience the learning benefits and resulting score increases, you come to rather enjoy tearing apart each wrong answer.
Q4 is a necessary assumption. If you negate AC(B) by saying no television viewers would "refuse" to watch a show that they knew was going to be controversial then there would be no downside to airing that kind of show. So for the argument to work, "…
For Q5 I think "mainstream" is meant to be considered "watched by most". So a reason to show political talk shows that are bland etc (the overall conclusion) you must assume that this is what most tv watchers want to watch.
I am not sure where all this concern about endurance is coming from everyone, but take it from someone who took the test once already, this will seem like the fastest 4 hours of your life. Adrenalin will be pumping the entire time. If anything you s…
A quick bracketing and notation of C for conclusion is a huge help. Same goes for P premise. For me that is step one after reading stimulus. It only takes a second and really situates the statements as they pertain to the argument.
@gs556 said:
I relied on process-of-elimination to quickly strike out the wrong choices and then made an educated guess based on what was left.
Indeed, until you find you've struck out all five. Then you might want to have a vague idea of what the…
@anupama.satyasai Right. @alexandergreene93 The argument’s conclusion is that “in addition to the known planets” (as if this argument is going anywhere) there MUST be an additional planet in our solar system. There must be some other “tugging forc…
Yeah... during my special sanitary training conference I went to the bathroom and did not wash my hands afterwards. Certificate looks great on my wall though!
@nicole.hopkins said:
Well, if it's working for practice, why not try it for PT's ?!?!
Hmm...There may be some trust/confidence issues I am still working on. The system is a bit herky jerky .. pondering....
@nicole.hopkins I love your advice. As a matter of fact, I love it especially because I started doing just what you said with a timer a couple of weeks ago. I use much older PTs and I don't care if I've seen the questions before. I still work throug…
@KimberlyK @nicole.hopkins @c.janson35 Oh yes, I had me a true-to-life horror story. At least your teacher actually held a J.D. Mine was a PhD but had never taken the LSAT. After two and a half classes it became painfully obvious she was bullsh*t’n …
@c.janson35 @Pacifico @nicole.hopkins Maybe Nicole would be willing to part with her signed copy of Ted Cruz' book in exchange for one of your $50 cards ;-/ J/K I know that'll never happen. Congrats to yall, we appreciate the advice!
@jmac800 As @c.janson35 said, trying to understand the sentence intuitively will help make better sense of its meaning. I picture in my head a row of wigs which I now know did not use human hair. What can be said of these wigs? Well according to th…