Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
nye8870
About
- Username
- nye8870
- Joined
- Visits
- 1,471
- Last Active
- Roles
- ⭐
Comments
-
@as5324therapy said: 2 most=some (some A are C) not correct...please check video above
-
JY says..." A--most-> B-most->C ....... No valid conclusions!"
-
http://classic.7sage.com/lesson/invalid-argument-form-6-of-7/
-
http://classic.7sage.com/lesson/what-counts-as-a-valid-diversity-factor/ (some great answers in this section)
-
@"Omed_OvO" said: I purchased them and once I complete the program, I'll blow the dust off of them and take them. You should make a one clean copy of each before you write on it to use for clean-copy-BR
-
@DumbHollywoodActor said: (soon to be a Tuesday, Thursday, Saturday) and the February group (soon to be Wednesday, Friday, Sunday) I have heard LSAC is petitioning the universe to extend weeks to eight days days so we literally have no free-time w…
-
BRing 32 tonite? @DumbHollywoodActor
-
Cool @nicole.hopkins ! Anything I can do to contribute please let me know... :-)
-
Thanks so much...hope all are enjoying your holiday!
-
@allan.kogan said: I am sure I will be able to do this! Keep this attitude!
-
I have this play when I take over two min.
-
Here it seems like Team 7sage. I imagine a world where the people who paid the least and got the most out of their LSAT studying experience went on to do the best... on the LSAT and beyond
-
@"GSU Hopeful" said: As your fundamentals develop, your idea of a "gimme" will change and you will eventually get to more and more. This actually happens. So I think it is crucially important, once you realize you got a correct answer very (almos…
-
Yes no maybe-so...I'm in limbo right now. Got the score I needed in October but tons of room for improvement. Been working a lot to make up for all the time I spent studying. Just don't wanna lose my edge if I decide to sit again.
-
I could only BR the first LR sec...thought I would just pop in for a few @DumbHollywoodActor
-
Buddying up is soo fetch!
-
Is anyone joining tonight?
-
Imagine a relic passes through area A and B but not C. According to the stim we would know that based on the AB pollen adhered to it. Now lets say ac(A) happens and pollen from area C blew on in while the relic was in area A or B and adhered to it. …
-
@Pacifico said: You simply don't have time for utilizing cumbersome methodologies This is some next-level sh*t !! And so true
-
Congrats @harrismegan !!!
-
@c.janson35 If you are a dog then you have a tail. Even if you are a dog you do not have a tail? I would think the negation of the first statement is: If you are a dog you may or may not have a tail. Or D some /T. - The negation simply stating that…
-
@mitrakhanom1 Having a caffeine content listing on soft drinks makes it easy for people to limit their intake. If limiting is something that is easy to do then people will do it. And if people do it (limit their intake) they will improve their heal…
-
@"mc_meatt" said: Should I just place "It's not the case that" in front of the conditional statements to deny them? Yes. This is true. But you must come to know what the conditional looks like if it's "not the case."
-
Yes, you can. But a lot of times going through that process takes up too much time, for me. I think it is very important to understand the fundamental workings of question type but then it is also important to be able to quickly spot (intuitively se…
-
First thing to recognize is that “mass evasion of the charge will result” is the logical equivalent to ”payment of charge will not be effectively enforced”. I’d like to call these MEOCR. Premise: /system --> MEOCR Conclusion: Plan implemented (f…
-
@LSATConspiracy Very concise! I like that :-)
-
@goalis180 said: I struggle with NA. This question type was the hardest for me all the way up to point ... when they became my favorite. Just keep drilling them and you should reach a level where they start to seem easy. Subtlety is everything. Ju…
-
@c.janson35 said: so I like to give myself this opportunity, at least, before skipping the question right off the bat. Now on test day, if you do this but still feel you must skip, do you bubble in a guess just in case you never do get back to it?
-
This relies on timeline-thinking. Ask yourself exactly when the mayor plans to implement the plan. If it's before the tech is ready then the conclusion could be true. In fact the only way the conclusion can be true is if there is a period before tec…
-
The first sentence is just context and does not have a place in our conditional chain. You are correct that the quantifier ELCI should "some" over to LCI. So replace ELCI --> LCI with ELCI -some-> LCI. Still ac(A) is correct. Nice spot!