Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
runiggyrun
About
- Username
- runiggyrun
- Joined
- Visits
- 1,307
- Last Active
- Roles
- Inactive Sage, Inactive ⭐
Comments
-
Plays fine on both my work and my home computer (both Windows OS). The ghost only haunts some of you it seems....
-
The second one means "ALL students at the school take math". Each and every one. Including Mike. For part-vs-whole arguments it is crucial to distinguish whether a characteristic presented describes the whole or whether it describes each of the pa…
-
Causation can appear in pretty much any of the "flaw" family questions, so in addition to strengthen and weaken you can have a causal relationship for NA, SA, and PSA questions, as well as the PF (parallel flaw) questions. Bear in mind that not all …
-
I think the correct answer works as a SA if you read "explained by the lower rates of destructive geophysical processes in these regions" to mean "explained by their lower rates of disappearance/destruction/obliteration in these regions". That would…
-
Hi @"Accounts Playable" . I think the key point here regarding B is that it doesn't matter how nutritious something is, if it's deadly poisonous it will kill you (you being a dinosaur that can't detox it). Maybe belladona berries are chock full of v…
-
It varies from test to test. That's why you'll see in the analyticals that some sections (by section I mean the collection of 4 games from a given test) are 1 star, some are 2 and so on up to 5. For instance PT 76 LG section has an overall rating …
-
@noobie1 Because few is "Some AND /Most", the negation of few is "none OR most". So the negation of "Few dogs are evil" is "either no dogs are evil or most dogs are evil" In the video about "few" JY mentions that the LSAT will rarely focus on the …
-
Generally you can't negate morally right to mean morally wrong because there are some actions that are neither. Same for right and wrong in general. Siting here eating soup is not morally right, but it's not morally wrong, either. So "eating soup" …
-
Mikey, I do that all the time - so many things that are clear in my head and not quite what I meant when put down on paper....
-
S@davidkim1109 The reason you are getting to a mistaken conditional is because your second phrase is not a complete sentence in English. Your first one is correct: Only human beings can have souls = Have souls -> Human beings The second one is …
-
I'll take a guess that this is PT9.S3Q8 (the LG section). Because the setup is telling us that exactly four people would be selected, and the stem for Q8 asks "which of the following could be the four people selected", yes, it means complete and ac…
-
Yes, you all PT17-PT77 video explanations for all sections.
-
I think the fact that it had been popular before can be inferred from the way that George phrases his question: "hardly anyone took lessons throughout the 80 and early 90's. Why are they doing it now?". That's a subtly different statement from "h…
-
For B I take "the more food is processed" to mean "the more food is processed by the manufacturer" rather than "processed by the body". Highly processed foods like white bread, white pasta, and so on have very little fiber left and it would be hard…
-
Kyra's argument boils down to : Too much fiber is bad. You should eat less fiber than you are currently eating. The weakening statement would be "but I'm not currently eating too much fiber. In fact, I'm not even eating enough fiber!". That's what…
-
The author is saying "when (if) the document was opened, the seal was reused", therefore there must have been a lot more seals originally than what we still have. But what if none of the documents were opened? Only 40,000 seals were affixed, and t…
-
It's never too early to start foolproofing games, especially if you're not naturally good at them. You don't have to have a game completely proofed before you move on to another, if you follow @pacifico's method you'll have some at different stages …
-
@JoeyPotato - there's a note in pink below the video that clarifies that the biconditional notation in the video is a mistake - I didn't notice that until now. Nice catch!
-
@Albertoduro1xx - just a clarification - the "proper" BR method does not involve reviewing just the questions you miss. If you already know which questions you've missed, then it's not a "blind" review. It involves circling the questions you are no…
-
No, you're not supposed to do them all back to back. Do them back to back one or two times, with a go through JY's videos in between. Essentially do them back to back until you feel you understand the game. Then do the same game/section again nex…
-
I think you might be confusing a biconditonal relationship with a premise/contrapositive relationship. The example you give is not a biconditional relationship. A biconditional would be S/Y, which would suggest that not having Y in a class means yo…
-
Weird. It does now, but I could have sworn it said PTB.S3.Q17. Maybe I'm losing my marbles...
-
An example of your premise that Most A are C and most B are C, therefore some A are B would be : Most birds (A) can fly (C). Most airplanes (B) can fly (C). Some birds are airplanes (some A are . You can see that it doesn't work. The relationshi…
-
The freezing is real, and it's a real pain in the neck. There was a very good post around here a while back about how it's basically a fight of flight response - you get into a panic mode and all your higher cognitive processes evaporate, because t…
-
TLS has specific application cycle threads for a lot of law schools, and a ton of applicants post updates. You can check out the thread for your intended school and see what the others have or haven't received yet. Not that it will make any materia…
-
@Micaela_OVO - if that's a real example I'm forever impressed by your knowledge of rap. And your explanation was excellent. I also often hear JY's voice in my head, just like you are pointing out! @Amanda.Washington - if you're a visual person, thi…
-
I'm guessing you are talking about PTB.1.17 - I think you can change the title to correct that. This is on my list of top 5 least favorite LR questions ever, and only after eliminating all the other answers was I able to sit and think about reasons …
-
Just took a quick peak at the employment statistics for both schools - University of South Carolina seems to have better numbers overall, but they appear to place virtually nobody in Mississippi. University of Mississippi looks like worse numbers ov…
-
The syllabus BR time is just a suggestion, and if you're including watching the videos in the BR time, 2 hrs doesn't sound excessive. The wisdom here is that BR takes however long it takes. As for skipping questions, I second @DumbHollywoodActor's…
-
@Vickpetrosian1 - I'm not implying that you wouldn't be able to get into a T20. Just that a full ride to one is not a given. I'm not that familiar with California schools, so I can only go by numbers, and according to LSAC a 170/3.3 gives you a 28…