Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
tams2018
About
- Username
- tams2018
- Joined
- Visits
- 1,004
- Last Active
- Roles
- Member
Comments
-
@Nicolekh said: @shrutisriv said: I was really looking forward to joining today's BR but couldn't end up making it .. when will you guys be doing the 2nd LR section for PT 62 / the next BR session? The schedule only mentions next S…
-
Yay! thanks. Speak with everyone on Sunday.
-
check out the webinar videos.
-
do a timed exam(preptest 36?) and then drill the question types from 1-30 that gives you consistent problems. You will know your weaknesses from time exams more than drill sets.
-
@Bamboosprout said: @Bumblebee said: Ah, ok. I see that the weakening method can be more clear, and that it makes sense that different people will do it differently. Like JY says, their core logic in all these questions are the …
-
I am interested.
-
Awesome story and achievement. Congratulations!
-
awesome! congratulations.
-
what do they mean?
-
arguments are the same, the answer choices are annoyingly slightly different.
-
@Supernovice said: Rhetorical question: Do you think you'd be the first person to attempt this? Come on. You can certainly pull this off. There are single parents with full-time jobs who struggled in school that buckle down and get thi…
-
the minimum is whatever that other variable has. So, if Sally has 5 apples and you have as many apples as she, then you have at least 5 apples (but you can have 6 or 20). What is NOT the case is that you have less than 5 apples.
-
Are you reviewing your PTs or are you just taking them back to back.
-
I say redo the lessons. What is stumping you? Is it logic? Numerical distribution? Question stems (like Could be True, Must Be False, Not Necessarily True? Pin point where you are coming up short (be specific as possible) and work the lessons that …
-
A couple of questions (they are somewhat related): How long does it take you to complete the readings? Are you reading for structure for your reading assignments like RC passages? Do you feel like your LSAT prep changed the way you read texts i…
-
soon you will be able to take the exam from the comforts of your own home. ha ha
-
Logic and flaws are all the same so I say right on for extra practice/drilling.
-
I wouldn't. Your mind won't be at peak performance compared to like a morning exam. But you never know, try it and let us know the outcome.
-
I read funny discussions such as this one.
-
Your post title could cause many a heart attack on this forum.
-
I think you need to review flaw lessons again. All weak arguments on the LSAT deal with a flaw in the argument in some way shape or form.
-
My goodness how did you ever get through the entire CC in three weeks?
-
Whatever is good for you. But I think you should mimic your actual practice exams to the time of the test though.
-
going digital? how is that going to work with logic games?
-
I would think the ability to parse through dense texts is something that will hopefully never be lost throughout your years in law school and as a lawyer.
-
Think of reading comprehension as a longer logical reasoning question. The background information or opposing point may have more sentences, but the point and supporting information should be about that same (even if more fleshed out).
-
I doubt the schools worth attending will do that. Maybe the others.
-
Yes. As a matter of fact, reading RC passages are like long LR passages. Sometimes the context or viewpoints are extended. One passage I read I swear like the first two paragraphs was basically like the context of where the author was going. It rea…
-
@AshleighK said: @tams2018 said: held off on PT for two weeks to drill RC. I am obsessed with succeeding this section of the test. I was debating this too but in my case, it would be LR. I'm going on vacation for two weeks …
-
the ones where I get them all the questions correct.