@Sprinkles said:
That is the most Canadian thing I have ever read. "They rejected me, I told them why I should be accepted, and now I'm accepted. "
Applicant: Hey you rejected me. Why??
Adcom:
https://78.media.tumblr.com/500ca1dfdd1d710eff…
Hey there!
PT1.S3.Q04
The crux of the argument is in the last sentence and its gist is as follows: for a country seeking military deterrence, an aggressor would have to believe that the country it wishes to attack maintains a greater retaliatory …
Pretty late to the party, but could somebody explain what factors have contributed to UCI's rise since its establishment?
Sincerely,
A Clueless Canadian
@estouten25 said:
I'll admit I'm pretty curious if that actually works or not. Anyone ever tried it?
https://classic.7sage.com/discussion/#/discussion/10600/per-daves-request-0l-pre-1l-prep-advice
Here's her post reviewing the course!
@LSATcantwin said:
Progress is finally being made! I got to file a dispute form today. They are going to upload the dispute form onto my applications so all the schools can see what is going on. That way the schools can see that it is the LSAC…
Yeah, I think your explanations for the answer choices are all correct. However, (D) actually does have the potency to strengthen the argument. The fact that, for the years surrounding the market crash, suicide rates are higher toward the end of the…
Yeah, I think you got the translation of the second premise wrong. It says that "all that is needed to save the koala is to stop deforestation”. That is, stopping deforestation is sufficient to save the panda. In other words, if we stop deforestatio…
The stimulus mentions that a "legislative proposal would allow individuals to set up savings accounts in which interest earned would be exempt from taxes until money is withdrawn from the account". In other words, these new savings account would be …
HI EVERYONE!
I'm from Toronto, and graduated with a BA in political science. I'm currently working 2 jobs: one's in the health care sector and the other's research with a Prof. I speak about 3 (.5-ish) languages and have experience teaching abroad …
@LSATcantwin said:
@thisissparta said:
Thank you for organizing this! Excited to hear about your journey @LSATcantwin!
It starts something like "A long time ago...in a galaxy far, far away....." and it ends with me killing …
Try mapping it out:
L -> N
L -m-> M
So, that means (i) all L's are N's and (ii) most L's are M's.
L N M
L N M
L N
L N
L N M
As you can see, there will be at least some points at which M and N occur simultaneously. This implies that …
Hey there!
Okay, so some rather complex verbiage that's been used in that question. But, once dissected, it's actually quite straightforward.
So, let's split the sentence, and keep referring back to the stimulus.
"This strategy lacks a counterpro…
@Lsatkayy said:
@thisissparta said:
Doubt either version of AC (A) would be right. The difference between (A) and (D) is subtle - (A) is wrong because it has the potency to be borne out of anecdotal evidence, while (D), like the st…
Doubt either version of AC (A) would be right. The difference between (A) and (D) is subtle - (A) is wrong because it has the potency to be borne out of anecdotal evidence, while (D), like the stimulus, is scientific fact.
Unless (A) would be phras…
Many does not imply some here. The words many and few are polar opposites of each other (at least in English) and the author's exact intention is to contrast something big (i.e., many) with something small (i.e. few). Many can be taken at its face …