Dial: 67.217.95.2##126612109

I think PT 71, Section 1, #12 is a pretty similar question

PT 33, S1, #12 (155)

Typically I bubble by page (I find bubbling each question individually takes too much time and ruins my "flow"), but at the end of each page I read each question number back in my mind and t

Typically I bubble by page (I find bubbling each question individually takes too much time and ruins my "flow"), but at the end of each page I read each question number back in my mind and t

I know you both are super busy so maybe add this to spot #1243231 on the list. Haha

Just finished my second PT (#12) and it seemed significantly easier than the 2007 diagnostic. In particular, RC was a breeze. Reading some previous discussions, I get the impression that older tests

I'm having trouble with this question

Hello,

STU (#129): (medians: 148/3.01)

be unreasonable to choose UCLA #16 over say the #12, 13, or 14 schools if I just like UCLA better? Also, if 14 does happen to be the magic number, how do we account for the fact that these rankings D

5 so A should jump out of you and then move on. #12 is also pretty straightforward as a quick board should show you the snakes must be doubled up and again just rotate through 1, 2, 4, and 5 as in th

Does anyone know the last time a logic game like PT #11, game 4 or PT#12 game four appeared on the LSAT?

toughest questions of the section early on say #12 or something.

I'm currently reviewing PT 37 that I completed yesterday and I'm on section 2 #12. Even watching JY's video, I'm still a little confused about the "cannot" and "with

Hi, everyone, for question #12, why the cultural conservatism is EXEMPLIFIED by uncritical attitude ? Because the two concepts lie in two pragraphs, and I don’t see a connection/relation being explici

PT45 S1 #12 is a great question!

What prompted my question here is PT45 S1 #12. It asks to weaken the conclusion that a causation relationship does not exist, which I interpreted (perhaps falsely) it means to strengthen the argument