The key word here is generally. Generally, yes. The progression of the test trends easier to harder, usually peaking around 20 -23 or so. Will #19 be harder than #18? Who knows. But will the aver
PT9,1,19 is within an RC passage about the Latin Bible and I checked the 2 LR sections in that PT- Q#19 does not fit your description. If there is any way to verify the PT, S, Q #'s - we are happ
I would like to know how to diagram Q#19, Sec5 from Sept 2009 LSAT. I've been looking at this question for hours and still don't see how to connect these ideas to make it a sufficient assump
A necessary assumption question, such as #19, asks us what assumption is required, or necessary, for the argument to obtain. A sufficient assumption questions asks us to justify the argument, but not
100% agree. One thing I see happen a lot is that people flip out a bit (myself included) when one of the first 10 q's seems hard. Yes, you might just be missing something simple. But if it seems
(LR question #1) or a nuclear bomb (LR question #19 parallel reasoning), they can both blow up and kill you if you're not careful. I found that I would miss questions if I fell into either extre