I also notice that I have more wrong answers on #17-#26. Yet, when I really look at those questions, they're actually pretty easy!

So, I'm skimming Ivey's book right now, and she says that only 0.1% of re-takers improve their scores and most people do worse on #2 & #3 LSAT. What's up with that statistic? Am I d

#2 Additional thought - I'm finding that my mind wanders with the abstract stories, rather than the more concrete stuff, such as stories about paintings, trees and animals, and Native Americans.

Agreed. I just had a difficult LR question that was #2. It was ridiculous.

The only real discrepancy I see here is whether you mash together Graeme's #1 and #2 into a combined read-and-diagram step, or if you separate them out and read first, then diagram (keeping in mi

On #2 I always advise against checking your answers because we advised someone a couple months ago who thought they had a BR that was consistently in the high 170s, and they were frustrated that their

Looking at the section again - #1 is a very easy strengthen question, #2 is a main conclusion with a very obvious structure, and #3's answer choice sticks out like a sore thumb by mentioning the

Looking at the section again - #1 is a very easy strengthen question, #2 is a main conclusion with a very obvious structure, and #3's answer choice sticks out like a sore thumb by mentioning the

Guys I use normal #2 pencils... You know the ones we used in elementary school. What advantage do these other pencils give you?

Here's a story to make you guys feel better about yourselves (schadenfreude). I felt awesome during this test. Didn't feel particularly stuck on any questions, didn't have to 'gues

These are all great suggestions! I guess my point though was more that I couldn't even create hypotheticals in the first place (like #21). I couldn't even devise how #21 was possible and the

The thing that really tripped me up was #20. I just didn't understand the fact that it was imperative that M had to pass off to J especially because #21 seemed like a direct violation of the rule

Thoughts? Am I just making major excuses to avoid studying (due to the fear of sucking on LSAT #2) or are there others out there who have grappled with a similar situation?

this argument valid?" Repeat with contender #2. It's got to totally seal things up, account for every options and force you to accept the conclusion as correct. Usually (sometimes?) stronge

I’ll give you an example: LG game 4 of PT 29, #23. In this sequencing game, you re-write the board putting P and O in different places. Most people put the O in 5 and the P (with 2 others) in 6, and t

2013 employment indicates ASU (Arizona now ranked #26) and MSU (Michigan State now ranked #94) had about 8.8% and 4.7% biglaw placement rates, respectively. On the other hand, Cornell (now ranked #13)

I have to apply it to a question (like PT 36, 1, #20), I’m paralyzed. I still am. I’ve been staring at this stupid question now for an hour!

@blah170blah did you get that from Manhattan? Right now, I’m BR-ing PT 36 s.1. #20 (been staring and thinking about this question for over 30 minutes now. At this rate, I’ll never find out my score) a

@brna0714 from what i understand, the blackwings are darker than #2/HB so they should be fine for bubbling. i believe the #2/HB requirement is in place to ensure that students don't use a lighter

I'm very interested in the Blackwings. I am an admitted and unashamed "school supply nerd." My only concern is that LSAC regulations specifically state #2/HB and it looks like the Black