#1. PT 36 Game 3: in my estimation the hardest game of all time.

First, it will let you get to the "low hanging fruit" or easier questions up ahead. Remember, all points are worth the same on the test. So if you get stuck on #13 you are likely wasting tim

https://media2.giphy.com/media/12MCs8dsnS1EuA/200.gif#1

For example, the following would be considered parallel to the argument stated above (in assumption #1) and thus, by extension, also to the reference argument:

PT 77 Section 2 #19: A recent study examined the daytime and nighttime activity patterns of two populations of tree-dwelling lemurs - the first living in a rain forest, where tree canopy cover is cons

However, on Sec 3 (LR), I got 10 answers wrong -- #15 through #25.

2) Enjoy your life before law school (see #1)

2) Enjoy your life before law school (see #1)

They do overlap (http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/logic-classical/#1), though the suggestion that logic is math in practice is misleading. There's just many different types of logic, some of whi

5) Related to #1: dress for success! What are the clothes that make you feel like a champ (that are comfy)? Put on dramatic lipstick if that's what feels good. Put on a suit if that feels empower

in that case, it means that I went to my step #1 and after repeating or drawing direct connections to any referential phrasing, I couldn't understand precisely what points support the conclusion

The first one just seems like it has a TON of content in it; I'm not saying it couldn't/wouldn't work just that it seems much harder to write a concise narrative that uses all of those

Idea for personal statement #1+ Biggest worry: I wanted to use my background as a health science student as the foundation for my personal statement. In particular, I wanted to emphasize how I was abl

I opted to do #1 today

I had the same problem for a while when I plateaued. I would go -6 on LR and I would almost ALWAYS miss the last 6 from 16 - 27. On my diagnostic June07 I got #13 wrong (or something like that) and li

You're misunderstanding the OP. #1 C suggests that stylistic portrayal is useful for humor in comedies. #2 And we know from stim that humor is important for comedy. So stylistic portrayal (non-re

#1 and #2 were totally me when I found out about 7Sage. Boy, was I wrong.

LOL I saw this earlier today on TLS and was cracking up! I think most of them apply to me.... Especially #3 and #10.

#17 "Time is no longer a dimension; it is a measure of your inadequacy."

S1-Q3 or S2-Q3). We then couple this with rule #1 and S2-Q3 is no longer a valid placement of the variables, leaving us with 1 valid way to have an S-Q arrangement: S1-Q3. It just so happens that w