Cooley Law School retroactively ranked themselves #1 for each of these years.

a 20 point jump in 6 months to get into the #14-20 schools. USC is #20. As far as transferring in, one of the posts above me nailed it. Everyone is going there to bust ass and compete. (Consider also

(3) If #1 above is correct, I would also like to know if you find pre-phrasing/predicting helpful, too. It seems as though it obviously would be. However, having just read the fantastic, "Think

Is it wrong to make this assumption? I think this is an interesting point and if you dont mind, look at PT 75-Section1-#18. I'm assuming the chief of police oversees many precincts, if 7/10 of th

Yo my #OVOcrew, the NJ snow is killing my day as well as my electricity and bodily energy today lol, won't be able to join but y'all enjoy! Get that #180BR #always!

Irrelevant pencil knowledge: Lead types are graded the way they are by 'hardness' - so, a #2 pencil is harder than a #1, but softer than a #3. Standardized testing companies all specify #2 b

2. I could have said anything in #1, and it wouldn't matter because this is a completely irrelevant thought process. You can't cancel anymore, you can't retake for another year at least

Just finished my second PT (#12) and it seemed significantly easier than the 2007 diagnostic. In particular, RC was a breeze. Reading some previous discussions, I get the impression that older tests

I would like to know how to diagram Q#19, Sec5 from Sept 2009 LSAT. I've been looking at this question for hours and still don't see how to connect these ideas to make it a sufficient assump

I'm having trouble with this question

Hello,

17.4.2 #15 The author is primarily concerned with…

Nonetheless, I've heard of kids from shit law schools going corporate from being #1 in their class.

You’ve got #1 right…If one Knowingly brings about misfortune --> Blamed

I definitely wouldn't write December if I didn't Atleast take all of the 60s and 70s with thorough review. Idk what your goal score is and where your tryna go, but it doesn't seem advis

#1 - Break 173 on the June LSAT, while applying to myriad of jobs in DC on the side to have a job in DC lined up to start in July. That way I will have roughly a year of WE in DC prior to law school (

Also I definitely agree with the analysis of the selection/confirmation biases above, but I still think reasons #1-6 and to a lesser extent 8 are valid reasons for considering a lower ranked school. F

But in the bizarre situation you had a 3.9+, 170+ and then went to a shitty law school and ended up #1 I could see you still transferring into Harvard since their transfer class is so big. Of course t

^^^ even then i.e. ending up #1 in your class... depending on your the rank of your current school... some schools might be out of reach.

(#1) I want to work in Texas once I graduate. I literally have zero desire to work anywhere else. (#2) It's located in the downtown area of a relatively large legal market (Houston, TX).