Well, LSAT over and today was my last LSAT day EVER as I've already been accepted to what is probably my #1 law school choice, taking all factors into consideration. Remembering the LSAC/7Sage r

toughest questions of the section early on say #12 or something.

I am confused about #5 on prep test 57 logic game #1. It is a substitution question type where it asks us to substitute M --> L (rule 3).

2. What's the best way to tell the difference between a correct strengthen answer and a premise booster (or de-booster for weaken questions?) Had a little problem on PT62 Sec 4 #14

Fool Proof method) with Cambridge LSAT games (PT #1-35) grouped by type. I started with simple sequencing and did all the games, in order of difficulty, again and again and one after the other until

The exception appears in PT 36, S 3, #14. But in that case the right answer choice has the negation of most. I think in that case the issue is not the word "most", since even if we replace &

a necessary assumption LR question in PT70, S1, #13 for instance and speedily and correctly eliminated three answers on the basis that they began with "most." Of course I went back to read

I just realized that the reason why I have trouble with suff assumption questions is because I have difficulty finding the core for difficult LRs. PT 63, S3 #17 is a prime example. I don't want t

but you need to have benchmark times. Mine are #10-10m, #15-15m, #20-25m. I know mine may be a little extreme, but I like to push the pace because I'm on autopilot from 1-14 for the most part(

So I recommend just trying to get VERY COMFORTABLE with the games. Another thing I blatantly remember is the first game from Sep 2014, I was in the room doing game #1 and I was thinking OMG this game

#1

Premise #1: I am hungry.

I'm currently reviewing PT 37 that I completed yesterday and I'm on section 2 #12. Even watching JY's video, I'm still a little confused about the "cannot" and "with

Lesson #1: If you are thinking that there is something you DON'T want, it's best to prepare for it.

Think of it this way you're the head of recruiting for a law firm that is "number 1" in the nation for healthcare law. You're looking for young law school student who will make a g

FAMILY # 1 is the PROVE family where the stimulus is taken to be true but the answer choices are under suspect and you must prove one of them to be correct. So family #1 contains: (6 question types)

The Q is PT36, S3, #14, answer choice C. I think phillip is right by just adding and deleting the "not".

#1 advice - ask questions. Lots of them. Someone who knows what they're doing will happily answer them all, and give you plenty of references on top of that. They will be completely open with you

I have found that writing out my own explanations for more difficult questions (basically any question later than #15 in a section) helps me IDENTIFY WHERE I GO WRONG.

Hi, everyone, for question #12, why the cultural conservatism is EXEMPLIFIED by uncritical attitude ? Because the two concepts lie in two pragraphs, and I don’t see a connection/relation being explici