You should call around to your list of schools and ask if they will accept the June LSAT. I was totally shocked when my #1 school said YES and confirmed they pushed back the application deadline.
What do you mean by your #1 point? I switched the two sentences around and it still made sense to me. "Because x, then z. In the long run, y." or "In the long run, y. Because x, then z.
i have a question on diagramming multiple conditionals: e.g., Q#15, section 1 of PT #63 (june 2011), choice B states, "if someone tells the same lie to two different people, then neither of those
So understand that's how it works. When considering law schools, this principle operates on a sliding scale. As you move closer to #1, you don't have to worry about it as much. As you move c
What prompted my question here is PT45 S1 #12. It asks to weaken the conclusion that a causation relationship does not exist, which I interpreted (perhaps falsely) it means to strengthen the argument
- Are you getting questions wrong because you are running out of time late in the section due to the generally harder questions in that region? If so, one of the more trendy tactics being discussed la
Whether it's a hand grenade (LR question #1) or a nuclear bomb (LR question #19 parallel reasoning), they can both blow up and kill you if you're not careful. I found that I would miss ques
Sure, I'd be happy to help. But since everyone here has access to those explanations (they're free with the free account: 7sage.com/enroll), can you post your questions about #18 and #22 on
Unfortunately, I'm still unclear for #18 and #22. I realize this is just really basic stuff but I'd feel much more comfortable if I could just get them clarified. You or anyone else willing