"Multiple Choice" and viewing question #2. Within question #2, the collapse function is indicated by the upward-facing arrow to the right of each AC and below the "fade-out/eliminate&q

Episode 21 is here!

However, C states that ONE instance of a "long" property is less important than other "short" properties.. Wouldn't this deny the assumption #2? If one out of all the number o

two sons are finished with college (actually, #2 graduates in May but has already started his full time job) and the younger two are finishing their freshmen year in college (yes, they are twins). My

Episode 20 is here!

#1 states there are only 13 plants. Person #2 states there are hundreds of these plants (or only 13). Now, what else is there in this passage that would make the reader assume that #2 person is right

Congratulations on your offer of admission! If the deposit deadline for your #2 is coming up, you should put down a seat deposit if you want to go to a law school this cycle. Your first choice school

So I was just accepted into one of my backup schools (#2 on my list to be specific). I was wondering if accepting at my backup school will have a negative affect on my prospects of being accepted into

[From PT69, Section 1, #20]

@ML_LSAT_Killa you seriously owe nothing to any law school unless you applied ED. I’m assuming you didn’t apply ED to your #1 choice and you didn’t ED your #2 choice either so you could just wait and

@ML_LSAT_Killa you seriously owe nothing to any law school unless you applied ED. I’m assuming you didn’t apply ED to your #1 choice and you didn’t ED your #2 choice either so you could just wait and

I stumbled upon a question that stated "otherwise" within the answer choices. (for reference: PT 63 Section 1 #21) J.Y. noted that otherwise means "or, and not both" which is a bic

Above the Law just placed them at #2 based on their measurements which are heavily based on employment opportunities and cost. https://abovethelaw.com/schools/university-of-virginia-law/

First time poster - doing some last minute studying. I'm reviewing November's test but I don't see JY's explanations for the last passage. Do you know if this is available anywhere

PT1, Section 4, #21 is the problem I was referring to. It imo definitively proves that the LSAT does not consider "many" to include 1. In addition, the problem that OP was asking about - the

inc. "easy" questions early on like #2 and #3 when I usually go -2 or -3) I spoke to my tutor and he says it happens all the time and more than likely burnout, so I've decided to take

In this stimulus, it tells us to discard #2, so our new comprehensive set of rules are:

Hi Friend -- I am not sure if you applied ED, but wanted to let you know that IT IS POSSIBLE to reach your goals, and your score DOES NOT define you as a JD candidate. I scored 163 on LSAT #2 and was

since I wasn't applying yet (silly error #2...should have been studying). Over the summer, I took two non-Sage courses (repeat; big error #3) and didn't seem to learn much and didn't

Referee #2: Instructor in sociology. Due to a health condition, he is not able to fulfill the requirements to be a full professor at this time, keeping him at the rank of instructor. However, he does