LR Question Referring To: PT#J07 S#3 Q#17 (Exercising muscles in one back...)

LR Question Referring To: PT#J07 S#3 Q#17 (Exercising muscles in one back...)

Hey all,

I had been practicing with the LSAT official books (50s, 60s, 70s) and I recently purchased the 80s via 7sage. I noticed that in the 80s, there's a bit of a shift with the LR. I can't quite

Northwestern University in Chicago is rank #10 and has accepted applicants with sub 3.0 GPAs and an LSAT score at about 169+

3. Scholarship dollars are for real. One year could save you 5+ in payments. Something to seriously consider. However, if you do go the year route, see #1.

* Scholarship dollars are for real. One year could save you 5+ in payments. Something to seriously consider. However, if you do go the year route, see #1.

In LR, I skip any PF questions after question #10 and come back if I have time. This has also boosted my average for LR. I was wondering if i can employ a similar strategy for RC. I find that the r

Hey, if I were you I would go and listen to the 7SAGE podcast. J.Y. addresses this in podcast #15!

What it looked like for me was: I clicked the "start section" button, and started reading passages / answering questions, and then was like, wait a minute, something's not right. And wh

I imagine that you are finishing with quite a bit of time left at the end, so my small advice would be to spend some time scanning questions #13-20 and reviewing the language of the stim. If you are c

"it is not the case that Amy never goes to the movies" means Amy sometimes goes to the movies (or #1)

Perspective #1 is easy to fall into as the numbers are right there after the PT, but this interpretation is a flawed perspective for this test. Each test is different not only in what is being questio

In the above case, when you deny C, you must deny A AND deny B. So your #1 and #2 statements are not correct.

I just have a question regrading And + Or in the SC and NC and what happens when you Satisfy the SC through Valid Argument Form #1 and Deny the NC through Valid Argument Form #2. Here is where my thin

With B, I can clearly see now that this answer denies assumption #1. The duration being long would sometimes allow one to classify it as such. This would weaken the argument.

Tangent - for the same reason, I differ from JY a bit on the last question of the birds in a forest game (in/out game #1 in the curriculum). He likes representing the new rule H -> /S by drawing a

I'm having problems understanding this sentence, extracted from PT23 Section3 #10:

Your timeframe is a marathon. That said, my #1 advice is be wise with the amount of material you are going to use over this timeframe. Running out of material is not fun. Make sure you get the most ou

this. In this passage, we are told that person #1 states there are only 13 plants. Person #2 states there are hundreds of these plants (or only 13). Now, what else is there in this passage that would