Dial: 67.217.95.2##270891637

questions 1-8 are in front of me and I skipped #2, I'd finish the rest of 1-8 first, then go back to #2 and answer it before turning the page and moving on to 9-15 on the next two pages. I hope

questions 1-8 are in front of me and I skipped #2, I'd finish the rest of 1-8 first, then go back to #2 and answer it before turning the page and moving on to 9-15 on the next two pages. I hope

First: you've got to get that LG down to a -2/-1: fool proof, but also attempt to go deeper into the underlying logic of the games, this is not an impossible goal, but should be your #2 priority

Right now, I'm weighing regional (which are #27 and #44 I think) and in the SW vs hybrid (Syracuse is #88). I have a rough lsat score, so will probably not be comitting this cycle. I have a grea

Right now, I'm weighing regional (which are #27 and #44 I think) and in the SW vs hybrid (Syracuse is #88). I have a rough lsat score, so will probably not be comitting this cycle. I have a grea

It's worth reading since it includes variables other than law school rankings to consider. BUT I feel like ranking still matters with job prospects. I am planning on applying to UCI (#21) or Loyo

definition #2 indicates that if something is universal, it is held by all. Every human society has language and every human society has money.

For context, my wife has doctorate #1 and is pursuing doctorate #2 both through hybrid programs like you describe, so I'm a fan of them for certain things. However, as far as I know, the ABA doe

Hmmmm, ok. I'll probably refrain from using #2, unless the school specifically demands an academic letter. Thank you.

-A→B therefore #1 A|B or #2 /B|/A

I would call admissions about #2. Maybe you can just write the years/months you worked there and write something vague about the nature of the job and note that it’s under an NDA so you can’t specify.

I would call admissions about #2. Maybe you can just write the years/months you worked there and write something vague about the nature of the job and note that it’s under an NDA so you can’t specify.

* I think you are good with #2. Any questions adcoms have can be followed up on. I've got one position like that on my resume that when questioned about it, I have to give a scripted response. Pe

Ahh that’s a tough one! Have you considered making #2 your personal statement and #1 a diversity statement? Diversity is not solely based on race and I think you have a very very unique story to tell

I'm going to start doing 2 preptests a week pretty soon. I'm thinking Saturday morning and wednesday afternoon for those. I'll BR the next day and figure out any trends I need to focu

My goal is T14, thus with my 3.5 GPA from a #231-#300 Ranked University (US News) I know I am going to need a great LSAT score....and a 150 is NOT cutting it.

Hey! First, congrats on winning those legal battles! Seriously, I hope you're very proud of that and are somehow incorporating it into your application (probably your personal statement). For a r

To add to this list - #20 part to whole flaw: PT 62, Sec 2, Q 7.

because folks think that it addresses weak point #2, the leap from small aircraft to all aircraft. If E said something along the lines of "fails to specify the percentage of all airline accident