which violates rule #3 so the answer is B. For #21 and #23, we have rules given so we could just try plugging them in and using any boards we have to answer more open questions like #22. If the lectu

Thank you for your response @sarakimmel

Episode 21 is here!

I stumbled upon a question that stated "otherwise" within the answer choices. (for reference: PT 63 Section 1 #21) J.Y. noted that otherwise means "or, and not both" which is a bic

PT1, Section 4, #21 is the problem I was referring to. It imo definitively proves that the LSAT does not consider "many" to include 1. In addition, the problem that OP was asking about - the

It's worth reading since it includes variables other than law school rankings to consider. BUT I feel like ranking still matters with job prospects. I am planning on applying to UCI (#21) or Loyo

Hey! First, congrats on winning those legal battles! Seriously, I hope you're very proud of that and are somehow incorporating it into your application (probably your personal statement). For a r

question 21 about Skiff's book was easy imo. I have to work on timing and pressure and anxiety. I found that all I needed was the time to write out #21 in formal logic, but during timed practice

The explanation for #21 in the PT82 game 4 is a good example (at ~14:00 minute mark):

PT 36, S3, #21 (276) 

https://media1.giphy.com/media/i6TQUuiT5hjSU/200.gif#21

because you burned 3 minutes each on #20 and #21, you skip 20 and 21, and are able to get the last 4 right because you're not in "high-pressure-holy-shit-time's-running-out" mode.

because you burned 3 minutes each on #20 and #21, you skip 20 and 21, and are able to get the last 4 right because you're not in "high-pressure-holy-shit-time's-running-out" mode.

be right, for some questions (e.g. P38, Sect 1, #21, difficulty level 4), most people seemed to have gotten it right (based on the answer choice distribution).

The following is #21 from the same quiz.

Hello,

Thanks so much again c.janson35! One last question, I promise. On PT 26 #21 "The companies that are" I had a difficult time diagramming a sentence without indicators. The premise "It is

These are all great suggestions! I guess my point though was more that I couldn't even create hypotheticals in the first place (like #21). I couldn't even devise how #21 was possible and the

The thing that really tripped me up was #20. I just didn't understand the fact that it was imperative that M had to pass off to J especially because #21 seemed like a direct violation of the rule

pt 51 sec 1 #21 MSS