trying to gauge the relationship between rule #3, it came down to choosing either A or C. I picked C, despite knowing A would have been my usual answer. Of course, that was the only question I got wr
than itself. For example, If country that's #3 in military power is a potential aggressor nation to the country in question, which is #10 in military power, and #3 country finds out that the oth
For #20, it's surprisingly simple. The second and third lectures cannot be given in H because that would mean we'd have three lectures given in H, which violates rule #3 so the answer is B.
Thank you SO SO much for sharing your story! I am a stay-at-home mom of 2 small children (3.5 years old and 11 months) and 4 months pregnant with baby #3 and would like to still have children in law s
If you listen to the podcast one of the girls does talk about this - I can't remember if it is #38 with Sami or #39 with Rochisha but what stuck with me about her comments is that in the real tes
Your original statement captures only one of the three worlds inherent in the not-both relationship. If you only wrote the statement as #3, then you'd be forgetting the first two possibilities on
everything" are true at the same time. #3 is not a correct negation because you can contradict the initial statement merely by saying nothing; you don't have to tell everyone a partial stor
I had some of the same hesitations about the #38 ranking, but I can tell you that UC Davis really does have a prestigious name here in CA. I would be happy to answer any questions you have about Da