The top prize in architecture, the Pritzker Prize, is awarded for individual achievement, like Nobel Prizes for science. But architects are judged by their buildings, and buildings are the result of teamwork. As achievements, buildings are not like scientific discoveries, but like movies, which compete for awards for best picture. Thus, it would be better if the top prize in architecture were awarded to the best building rather than the best architect.

Summarize Argument
The author concludes that the top prize in architecture should go to the best building, not the best architect. She supports this with an analogy, saying that, because they are the results of teamwork, buildings are like movies, not scientific discoveries, and movies compete for awards for best picture.

Describe Method of Reasoning
The author supports her conclusion about how awards should be given in architecture by pointing out how awards are given in film and science. Because architectural achievements involve teamwork and so are more like movies than scientific discoveries, architectural awards should be given for best building, just like movie awards are given for best picture.

A
reaching a conclusion about the way something should be done in one field on the basis of comparisons with corresponding practices in other fields
The author reaches a conclusion about the way awards should be given in architecture based on comparisons with the way awards are given in science and film. Architectural achievements are more like movies than scientific discoveries, so awards should be given for best building.
B
making a distinction between two different types of objects in order to conclude that one has more inherent value than the other
The author doesn’t make any claims about the inherent value of architectural achievements, scientific discoveries, or movies.
C
pointing to similarities between two practices as a basis for concluding that criticisms of one practice can rightly be applied to the other
The author does point to a similarity between architecture and movies, but she doesn’t do so to conclude that criticisms of one can be applied to the other.
D
arguing that because two different fields are disanalogous, the characteristics of one field are not relevant to justifying a conclusion about the other
The author does mention that the fields of architecture and science are disanalogous, but her conclusion is about how awards in architecture should be more like awards in movies.
E
contending that an action is inappropriate by presenting an argument that a corresponding action in an analogous case is inappropriate
The author doesn't address whether any actions are “inappropriate,” she just argues that there is a better way to give architectural awards. Also, she does this by presenting an argument that awards in an analogous field (film) are done well, not that they’re inappropriate.

10 comments

Economist: Currently, many countries rely primarily on taxing income to fund government expenditures. But taxing income does nothing to promote savings and investment. Taxing consumption, on the other hand, would encourage savings. The most important challenge facing these countries is improving their economies, and the only way to accomplish this is to increase their savings rates. Hence, _______.

Summary

Many countries primarily rely on taxing income to support government spending. Taxing income does not promote savings and investment. In contrast, taxing consumption would encourage saving. In these countries, the biggest challenge is improving their economies. The only way to accomplish this is to increase savings rates.

Strongly Supported Conclusions

Hence, many countries should primarily tax consumption as opposed to income.

A
most governments should stop taxing savings and investment

This answer is unsupported. To say that most governments should take action is too strong. The stimulus is limited to “many” countries, not most countries.

B
the economies of countries will rapidly improve if their governments adopt tax policies that encourage savings and investment

This answer is unsupported. We don’t know from the stimulus whether these countries’ economies would improve rapidly. It could be the case that they improve slowly, or gradually.

C
in most countries taxes on consumption alone could raise adequate revenues to fund government expenditures

This answer is unsupported. To say that most countries could achieve this is too strong. The stimulus is limited to “many” countries, not most countries.

D
the tax laws of many countries should be revised to focus on taxing consumption rather than income

This answer is strongly supported. We know from the stimulus that taxing consumption encourages savings. Therefore, this would be a better strategy for improving savings rates than taxing income.

E
it is detrimental to the economic improvement of any country to continue to tax income

This answer is unsupported. To say that this is detrimental to any country is too strong. The stimulus is limited to “many” countries, not any country.


7 comments

There are already more great artworks in the world than any human being could appreciate in a lifetime, works capable of satisfying virtually any taste imaginable. Thus, contemporary artists, all of whom believe that their works enable many people to feel more aesthetically fulfilled than they otherwise could, are mistaken.

Summarize Argument: Counter-Position
The author concludes that no contemporary artists’ works enable lots of people to feel more aesthetically fulfilled than those people otherwise would be. (In other words, if the contemporary artists’ works never existed, there aren’t a lot of people who would be less fullfilled than they are right now.) This is based on the fact that there are already more great artworks in the world than any one person could appreciate in a lifetime, and those works can satisfy any preference.

Identify and Describe Flaw
The author overlooks the possibility many people might not be able to access as much artwork that is to their taste if certain contemporary artists’ works did not exist. That artwork might exist in the world, but merely being available in the world does not guarantee that everyone will be able to access it.

A
overlooks the possibility that not all contemporary artists believe that their works enable many people to feel more aesthetically fulfilled than they otherwise could
This isn’t overlooked, because the author states as a premise that “all” contemporary artists believe that their works enable many people to feel more aesthetically fulfilled than they otherwise could.
B
presumes, without providing justification, that most human beings are inclined to take the time to appreciate many great artworks
The argument concerns the level of aesthetic fulfillment that many people could have if contemporary artists’ works did not exist; whether people actually want to see art is a separate issue.
C
presumes, without providing justification, that the value of an artwork depends on the degree to which human beings appreciate it
The argument doesn’t concern the “value” of an artwork. It’s about whether contemporary artists allow many people to feel more fulfilled than those people otherwise could be. This is a separate issue from the worth or value of an artwork.
D
overlooks the possibility that the work of at least one contemporary artist is appreciated by many people whose access to the great majority of other artworks is severely restricted
This possibility shows that there might be some cont. artist who does bring more aesthetic fulfillment to many people than those people could otherwise have. If that artist weren’t around, many might not have access to art of the particular style/taste that the artist produced.
E
presumes, without providing justification, that the number and variety of great artworks already in the world affects the amount of aesthetic fulfillment derivable from any contemporary artwork
The argument doesn’t concern whether existing artwork “affects” (changes) the aesth. fulfillment people get from art. It’s about whether, if certain art didn’t exist, people would be able to replace the fulfillment from that art with existing art. Can people find a substitute?

78 comments