Madden: Industrialists address problems by simplifying them, but in farming that strategy usually leads to oversimplification. For example, industrialists see water retention and drainage as different and opposite functions—that good topsoil both drains and retains water is a fact alien to industrial logic. To facilitate water retention, they use a terrace or a dam; to facilitate drainage, they use drain tile, a ditch, or a subsoiler. More farming problems are created than solved when agriculture is the domain of the industrialist, not of the farmer.

Summary

Industrialists solve problems by simplifying them, but if this strategy were applied to farming the result would be oversimplification. For example, an industrialist sees water retention and drainage as opposite functions when in fact these factors aren’t necessarily so. Industrialists would facilitate retention by using a terrace or dam, and they would facilitate drainage using a drain tile, ditch, or subsoiler. In farming, more problems are created than solved using the industrialists’ methods.

Strongly Supported Conclusions

Problems associated with farming should be addressed by recognizing the complexity of a given problem.

A
The handling of water drainage and retention is the most important part of good farming.

This answer is unsupported. We don’t know whether drainage and retention are the most important factors of good farming. These factors were given as an example to illustrate how industrialists would oversimplify these issues.

B
The problems of farming should be viewed in all their complexity.

This answer is strongly supported. The Madden’s criticism with industrialists is that industrialists tend to simplify problems. Applying this strategy to farming would result in oversimplification.

C
Farmers are better than anyone else at solving farming problems.

This answer is unsupported. We don’t know whether farmers are better than anyone else. At best, we only know that farmers are better suited than industrialists to solve farming problems.

D
Industrial solutions for problems in farming should never be sought.

This answer is unsupported. Saying industrial solutions should “never” be sought is too strong. We only know from the stimulus that these solutions usually lead to oversimplification. There could be some instances where these solutions don’t lead to oversimplifications.

E
The approach to problem solving typical of industrialists is fundamentally flawed.

This answer is unsupported. The Madden is not arguing that an industrialist approach to solving problems is “fundamentally flawed.” Rather, the Madden is arguing that these approaches are flawed when specifically applied to farming.


19 comments

Critic: As modern methods of communication and transportation have continued to improve, the pace of life today has become faster than ever before. This speed has created feelings of impermanence and instability, making us feel as if we never have enough time to achieve what we want—or at least what we think we want.

Summary

As modern ways of communication and transportation improve, the faster the pace of life has become. The faster the pace of life has become, the more we feel as if we never have enough time to achieve what we want or what we think we want.

Strongly Supported Conclusions

Technological changes can result in changing the way people feel about life.

A
The fast pace of modern life has made it difficult for people to achieve their goals.

This answer is unsupported. We don’t know whether or not it is difficult for people to achieve their goals in modern life.

B
The disadvantages of technological progress often outweigh the advantages.

This answer is unsupported. We don’t know from the stimulus what the advantages are from technological progress. It could be that they vastly outweigh the disadvantages.

C
Changes in people’s feelings about life can result from technological changes.

This answer is strongly supported. This answer correctly states the causal relationship between improved technology and the way people feel.

D
The perception of impermanence in contemporary life makes it more difficult for people to know what they want.

This answer is unsupported. We don’t know from the stimulus whether any of the technological improvements are impermanent.

E
Changes in people’s feelings fuel the need for technological advancement.

This answer is unsupported. This answer gets the causal relationship reversed. Rather, it’s technological advancement that fuels the changes in people’s feelings.


16 comments

Software reviewer: Dictation software allows a computer to produce a written version of sentences that are spoken to it. Although dictation software has been promoted as a labor-saving invention, it fails to live up to its billing. The laborious part of writing is in the thinking and the editing, not in the typing. And proofreading the software’s error-filled output generally squanders any time saved in typing.

Summarize Argument: Counter-Position
Dictation software, which allows computers to transcribe spoken sentences, is advertised as a labor-saving invention, but it fails to live up to this promise. The most labor-intensive part of writing is thinking and editing, not typing. Furthermore, the time spent double-checking the dictation software outweighs the time saved by not typing it.

Identify Argument Part
This is the main conclusion of the argument

A
It is the argument’s main conclusion but not its only conclusion.
Although this is the main conclusion, there are no other conclusions in this argument. All of the premises support this statement.
B
It is the argument’s only conclusion.
This is the main (and only) conclusion. All of the premises support the conclusion that dictation software does not save time when working.
C
It is an intermediate conclusion that is offered as direct support for the argument’s main conclusion.
This is the only conclusion in the argument. It is also not an intermediate conclusion because it does not give support to another conclusion (because it is the only one)
D
It is a premise offered in support of the argument’s conclusion.
This is not a premise; it does not support any conclusion. This statement only receives support, making it the argument’s main conclusion.
E
It is a premise offered as direct support for an intermediate conclusion of the argument.
This is not a premise; this is the argument's main (and only) conclusion. It does not give any support, so it cannot be a premise.

12 comments