The diet of Heliothis subflexa caterpillars consists entirely of fruit from plants of the genus Physalis. These fruit do not contain linolenic acid, which is necessary to the growth and maturation of many insects other than H. subflexa. Linolenic acid in an insect’s diet is also necessary for the production of a chemical called volicitin. While most caterpillar species have volicitin in their saliva, H. subflexa does not.

Summary

Most caterpillar species have volicitin in their saliva.

If an insect produces volicitin, then it must have linolenic acid in its diet.

Many insects need linolenic acid to grow.

*Physalis* plants don’t contain linolenic acid.

*H. subflexa* caterpillars only eat *Physalis* plants.

*H. subflexa* caterpillars don’t have volicitin in their saliva.

Very Strongly Supported Conclusions

Most caterpillar species have linolenic acid in their diets.

Most caterpillar species don’t eat only *Physalis* plants.

Many insects can’t grow and mature if they only eat *Physalis* plants.

A
H. subflexa caterpillars synthesize linolenic acid within their bodies.

Unsupported. *H. subflexa* caterpillars don’t get linolenic acid from their diets, but this doesn’t necessarily mean that they synthesize it within their bodies. They might just not need any linolenic acid or volicitin.

B
Most species of caterpillar have sources of linolenic acid in their diets.

Very strongly supported. Most species of caterpillar have volicitin in their saliva. And if an insect produces volicitin, then it must have linolenic acid in its diet. So most species of caterpillar have linolenic acid in their diets.

C
Any caterpillar that has linolenic acid in its diet has volicitin in its saliva.

Unsupported. If a caterpillar has volicitin in its saliva, then it must have linolenic acid in its diet. But this doesn’t necessarily mean that if a caterpillar has linolenic acid in its diet, then it must have volicitin in its saliva. (C) reverses the conditional claim.

D
A food source containing linolenic acid would be poisonous to H. subflexa caterpillars.

Unsupported. *H. subflexa* caterpillars only eat plants that don’t contain linolenic acid. But this doesn’t necessarily mean that plants that do contain linolenic acid are poisonous to them. They might just hatch on *Physalis* plants and never move to other plants.

E
No caterpillars other than H. subflexa eat fruit from plants of the genus Physalis.

Unsupported. Most caterpillars have linolenic acid in their diets. But this doesn’t mean that no other caterpillars eat *Physalis* plants. There might be others like *H. subflexa* that only eat *Physalis* plants, or some that eat *Physalis* plants and other plants with linolenic acid.


10 comments

Zoologist: Plants preferentially absorb heavy nitrogen from rainwater. Heavy nitrogen consequently becomes concentrated in the tissues of herbivores, and animals that eat meat in turn exhibit even higher concentrations of heavy nitrogen in their bodily tissues. We compared bone samples from European cave bears of the Ice Age with blood samples from present-day bears fed meat-enriched diets, and the levels of heavy nitrogen present in these samples were identical. Thus, the prehistoric European cave bears were not exclusively herbivores.

Summarize Argument: Phenomenon-Hypothesis
The zoologist hypothesizes that prehistoric European cave bears were not exclusively herbivores. This is supported by observations about bears’ heavy nitrogen levels, which are higher in meat-eating animals. Bone samples from cave bears contained heavy nitrogen levels as high as those in blood samples from modern, meat-eating bears.

Notable Assumptions
The zoologist assumes that heavy nitrogen levels in animals’ bones and blood are similar. The zoologist also assumes that heavy nitrogen levels did not change over time in the prehistoric bear samples, and that heavy nitrogen levels in the ecosystem back then were comparable to current levels.

A
Plants can also absorb heavy nitrogen from a variety of sources other than rainwater.
This is irrelevant. The argument has already established that plants absorb heavy nitrogen, so the exact source of the heavy nitrogen doesn’t matter.
B
The rate at which heavy nitrogen accumulated in the blood of Ice Age herbivores can be inferred from samples of their bones.
This is irrelevant, since the argument doesn’t make claims based on the rate of accumulation of heavy nitrogen in tissue, only the concentration of heavy nitrogen.
C
The same number of samples was taken from present-day bears as was taken from Ice Age cave bears.
This is irrelevant, because the exact number of samples doesn’t really make a difference. Either there were enough samples to be representative or there weren’t—either way, it would be equally possible to have the same number of samples.
D
Bone samples from present-day bears fed meat-enriched diets exhibit the same levels of heavy nitrogen as do their blood samples.
This strengthens by providing a closer comparison between cave bears and modern bears. If modern bears’ heavy nitrogen levels are identical between blood and bone, it’s more reasonable to draw conclusions by comparing cave bears’ bones and modern bears’ blood.
E
The level of heavy nitrogen in the bones of any bear fed a meat-enriched diet is the same as that in the bones of any other meat-eating bear.
This is irrelevant, since we can already be confident that the heavy nitrogen level in the modern bear samples is representative of a diet that includes meat.

26 comments

Businessperson: Because the parking area directly in front of the building was closed for maintenance today, I was late to my meeting. If the maintenance had been done on a different day, I would have gotten to the meeting on time. After finding out that I could not park in that area it took me 15 minutes to find an available parking space, making me a few minutes late.

Summarize Argument
The businessperson concludes that she would’ve been on time for her meeting if parking area maintenance had been done on a different day. This is because it took her 15 minutes to find parking since the parking area was closed for maintenance, hence why she arrived late.

Notable Assumptions
The businessperson assumes that she would’ve been on time if the parking area hadn’t had maintenance going on. This means she assumes that she would’ve been able to find parking in the parking area if it had been open.

A
What were the reasons for performing maintenance on the parking area directly in front of the building on that particular day?
We don’t care why maintenance was being performed. We care if the maintenance actually made the businessperson late for her meeting.
B
Were any other of the meeting attendees also late to the meeting because they had difficulty finding parking?
We don’t know if other meeting attendees drove to the meeting. Even if none of the others were late because of parking, it could just be that those people took the bus or walked to work.
C
What are the parking patterns in the building’s vicinity on days when the parking area in front of the building is open?
If the parking area is generally crowded, perhaps to the point of being full, then maintenance wasn’t the problem as the businessperson claims—she wouldn’t have found parking, anyway. If the parking area is generally empty, she would’ve found parking.
D
Does the businessperson have a tendency to be late to meetings?
We don’t care if she’s often late to meetings. It could still be she would’ve been on time if not for the maintenance.
E
Was it particularly important that the businessperson not be late to this meeting?
Irrelevant. How important this meeting was has no bearing on why the businessperson was late.

48 comments