Salvador: Since current demand for antique ivory exceeds the supply, many people who are unconcerned about endangered species but would prefer to buy antique ivory are buying new ivory instead. People sharing your concern about endangered species, therefore, should refrain from buying any ivory at all—thereby ensuring that demand for new ivory will drop.
A
there are substances that can serve as satisfactory substitutes for ivory in its current uses
B
decreased demand for antique ivory would cause a decrease in demand for new ivory
C
people should take steps to avert a threat to the continued existence of elephant herds
D
a widespread refusal to buy new ivory will have a substantial effect on the survival of elephants
E
people concerned about endangered species should refuse to buy ivory objects that are less than 75 years old
If so, firing 10 workers would decrease the manufacturing plant’s workforce. In addition to lacking the absentee workers, the plant would now lack the fired workers. And thus production might decrease.
A
ignores the possibility that if 10 workers were fired, each of the remaining workers would produce more televisions than previously
B
fails to show that the absentee rate would drop if 10 workers were fired
C
takes for granted that the normal rate of production can be attained only when no more than the average number of workers are absent
D
overlooks the possibility that certain workers are crucial to the production of televisions
E
takes for granted that the rate of production is not affected by the number of workers employed at the plant
Political candidates’ speeches are loaded with promises and with expressions of good intention, but one must not forget that the politicians’ purpose in giving these speeches is to get themselves elected. Clearly, then, these speeches are selfishly motivated and the promises made in them are unreliable.
Summarize Argument
The author concludes that politicians’ speeches are selfishly motivated and their promises are unreliable. She supports this by saying that their main goal in giving speeches is to get elected.
Identify and Describe Flaw
This is the cookie-cutter “ad hominem” flaw, where the author attacks the person or group making an argument instead of the argument itself.
Here, the author assumes politicians' promises are unreliable just because they have other motives for making those promises. However, having ulterior motives doesn't necessarily make a promise unreliable.
A
The argument presumes, without providing justification, that if a person’s promise is not selfishly motivated then that promise is reliable.
The author assumes the opposite of (A). She assumes, without providing justification, that if a person’s promise is selfishly motivated then that promise is unreliable.
B
The argument presumes, without providing justification, that promises made for selfish reasons are never kept.
The author assumes, without providing justification, that promises made with ulterior motives are unreliable. She doesn’t claim that the promises are never kept, just that they can’t be relied upon. Perhaps some of these promises are still kept, even though they’re unreliable.
C
The argument confuses the effect of an action with its cause.
The author’s argument doesn’t use causal reasoning at all, so she never confuses an effect with a cause.
D
The argument overlooks the fact that a promise need not be unreliable just because the person who made it had an ulterior motive for doing so.
In other words, the author overlooks the fact that a promise could still be reliable, even though the person who made it had an ulterior motive for doing so. Having ulterior motives doesn't necessarily make a promise unreliable.
E
The argument overlooks the fact that a candidate who makes promises for selfish reasons may nonetheless be worthy of the office for which he or she is running.
The author never makes any claims about whether candidates who make promises for selfish reasons are worthy of their office. She just claims that their promises are unreliable.