Philosopher: Graham argues that since a person is truly happy only when doing something, the best life is a life that is full of activity. But we should not be persuaded by Graham’s argument. People sleep, and at least sometimes when sleeping, they are truly happy, even though they are not doing anything.

Summarize Argument: Counter-Position

The philosopher concludes that we should be skeptical of Graham’s argument. Graham starts with the premise that you need to be doing something in order to be truly happy, and uses that premise to conclude that the best life must be full of activity. But the philosopher disagrees with Graham’s premise—she notes that while sleeping, people can be truly happy even through they’re doing nothing.

Identify Argument Part

The claim in the question stem is a premise of the philosopher’s argument. It provides a counterexample to Graham’s only premise by illustrating that “doing something” isn’t actually a requirement for a person to be truly happy. By undermining Graham’s premise, the claim in the question stem in turn casts doubt on Graham’s overall argument.

A
It is a premise of Graham’s argument.

It is a premise of the philosopher’s argument, not Graham’s. It directly contradict’s Graham’s premise.

B
It is an example intended to show that a premise of Graham’s argument is false.

Sleeping is an example of an activity that runs completely counter to Graham’s premise. If, while sleeping, people can be truly happy while doing nothing at all, then Graham’s premise (that people must do something in order to be truly happy) must be false.

C
It is an analogy appealed to by Graham but that the philosopher rejects.

It is the philosopher’s own premise—the philosopher does not reject it. It is also not an analogy; it is a direct example of an activity that runs counter to Graham’s premise.

D
It is an example intended to disprove the conclusion of Graham’s argument.

The philosopher doesn’t go so far as to say that the best life is not a life that is full of activity. In fact, she doesn’t take any position on what the best life entails. She merely calls Graham’s conclusion into question by rejecting his premise.

E
It is the main conclusion of the philosopher’s argument.

It is a premise for the philosopher’s main conclusion. The fact that people can be truly happy while not doing anything undermines Graham’s only premise, which in turns supports the philosopher’s conclusion that we should be skeptical of Graham’s argument.


27 comments

Historian: In rebuttal of my claim that West influenced Stuart, some people point out that West’s work is mentioned only once in Stuart’s diaries. But Stuart’s diaries mention several meetings with West, and Stuart’s close friend, Abella, studied under West. Furthermore, Stuart’s work often uses West’s terminology which, though now commonplace, none of Stuart’s contemporaries used.

Summary

The historian claimed that West influenced Stuart. Other people think West didn’t influence Stuart, because Stuart’s diaries mention West’s work only once. The historian responds to this objection by pointing out that Stuart has a close friend who studied under West, and that Stuart’s diaries mention meetings with West. The historian also points out that Stuart’s work often uses the same terms as West, even though other people working around the same time as Stuart didn’t use those words.

Strongly Supported Conclusions

The fact West’s work was mentioned only once in Stuart’s diaries does not imply that Stuart was not influenced by West.

There’s strong evidence Stuart was influenced by West.

A
Stuart’s discussions with Abella were one of the means by which West influenced Stuart.

Unsupported. There’s no support for the idea that “discussions” were the means by which Stuart was influenced. We don’t even know if Stuart and Abella had discussions. Maybe Stuart was influenced through reading Abella’s work, which could have been influenced by West.

B
It is more likely that Stuart influenced West than that West influenced Stuart.

Unsupported. The stimulus suggests that West influenced Stuart. But it doesn’t say anything concerning whether Stuart influenced West.

C
Stuart’s contemporaries were not influenced by West.

Unsupported. Although the author believes the language Stuart used is evidence of influence by West, that doesn’t suggest people who didn’t use that language weren’t influenced. The contemporaries could have been influenced, but in a way that didn’t involve using West’s words.

D
Stuart’s work was not entirely free from West’s influence.

Strongly supported. The historian points out evidence showing potential influence, including meetings with West, friendship with one of West’s students, and use of distinctive language also used by West. This isn’t a “must be true” conclusion, but it is most strongly supported.

E
Because of Stuart’s influence on other people, West’s terminology is now commonplace.

Unsupported. Although we know the terminology is now commonplace, that stimulus doesn’t tell us why it became commonplace.


13 comments

One theory to explain the sudden extinction of all dinosaurs points to “drug overdoses” as the cause. Angiosperms, a certain class of plants, first appeared at the time that dinosaurs became extinct. These plants produce amino-acid-based alkaloids that are psychoactive agents. Most plant-eating mammals avoid these potentially lethal poisons because they taste bitter. Moreover, mammals have livers that help detoxify such drugs. However, dinosaurs could neither taste the bitterness nor detoxify the substance once it was ingested. This theory receives its strongest support from the fact that it helps explain why so many dinosaur fossils are found in unusual and contorted positions.

Summarize Argument: Phenomenon-Hypothesis
The author hypothesizes that “overdoses” on plants called angiosperms could’ve caused the sudden extinction of all dinosaurs. She bases this on the fact that dinosaurs couldn’t taste the plant’s bitterness or detoxify its poison, and that many dinosaur fossils are found in unusual and contorted positions.

Notable Assumptions
The author assumes that the fossils’ contorted positions are caused by poisoning from angiosperms, without considering other possible explanations for their positions.
The author assumes that, just because dinosaurs couldn’t avoid angiosperms by tasting their bitterness, they couldn’t avoid them at all. She thus assumes that dinosaurs were eating any angiosperms, a point which is never established.
She also assumes that angiosperms, which were “potentially lethal,” were deadly enough to cause the immediate extinction of all dinosaurs.

A
Many fossils of large mammals are found in contorted positions.
(A) undermines the theory by showing that there must be some other cause for the contorted shapes of large animals’ fossils. Most mammals avoided angiosperms but many still have contorted fossils. So, something other than angiosperms must have caused those fossil positions.
B
Angiosperms provide a great deal of nutrition.
This doesn’t weaken the argument because, even if angiosperms did provide nutrition, they were also poisonous. We also still don’t know that dinosaurs ate angiosperms in the first place.
C
Carnivorous dinosaurs mostly ate other, vegetarian, dinosaurs that fed on angiosperms.
By showing that some dinosaurs ate angiosperms, (C) slightly strengthens the argument. It doesn't challenge the author's theory or her assumptions that angiosperms were toxic enough to cause dinosaurs' extinction or that the contorted fossil positions were due to these plants.
D
Some poisonous plants do not produce amino-acid-based alkaloids.
This doesn’t change the fact that angiosperms do produce amino-acid-based alkaloids. So it does nothing to weaken the theory or to show that the author’s many assumptions are invalid.
E
Mammals sometimes die of drug overdoses from eating angiosperms.
We still don’t know that dinosaurs ever ate angiosperms, but (E) shows that angiosperm overdoses can cause death. So, if anything, this slightly strengthens the theory by confirming that angiosperms are poisonous enough to occasionally kill mammals.

37 comments

There are two ways to manage an existing transportation infrastructure: continuous maintenance at adequate levels, and periodic radical reconstruction. Continuous maintenance dispenses with the need for radical reconstruction, and radical reconstruction is necessitated by failing to perform continuous maintenance. Over the long run, continuous maintenance is far less expensive; nevertheless, it almost never happens.

"Surprising" Phenomenon
Why are highways rarely maintained continuously when doing so is cheaper than rebuilding them periodically?

Objective
Any hypothesis resolving this discrepancy will state another difference between continuous maintenance and radical reconstruction that explains why continuous maintenance is rare. This difference will make continuous maintenance unattractive or unattainable despite its lower cost in the long run.

A
Since different parts of the transportation infrastructure are the responsibility of different levels of government, radical reconstruction projects are very difficult to coordinate efficiently.
This deepens the mystery. If radical reconstruction is more difficult than continuous maintenance, why is it more common?
B
When funds for transportation infrastructure maintenance are scarce, they are typically distributed in proportion to the amount of traffic that is borne by different elements of the infrastructure.
This is not relevant. It is not implied whether infrastructure bearing heavy traffic is more or less likely to receive funds for continuous maintenance.
C
If continuous maintenance is performed at less-than-adequate levels, the need for radical reconstruction will often arise later than if maintenance had been restricted to responding to emergencies.
This deepens the mystery. If even sporadic maintenance delays the expensive radical reconstruction projects, even imperfect continuous maintenance is a worthwhile investment.
D
Radical reconstruction projects are, in general, too costly to be paid for from current revenue.
This does not explain why radical reconstruction projects are more common than continuous maintenance. It is not implied whether projects funded with current revenue are more or less favorable than those not funded with current revenue.
E
For long periods, the task of regular maintenance lacks urgency, since the consequences of neglecting it are very slow to manifest themselves.
This explains why continuous maintenance is so rare. Though cheaper in the long run, it is not perceived as urgent, and so receives a low priority.

9 comments

A good way to get over one’s fear of an activity one finds terrifying is to do it repeatedly. For instance, over half of people who have parachuted only once report being extremely frightened by the experience, while less than 1 percent of those who have parachuted ten times or more report being frightened by it.

Summarize Argument: Phenomenon-Hypothesis
The author concludes that a good way to get over one’s fear of an activity is to do that activity repeatedly. This is based on the fact that over half of people who have parachuted only once report being frightened by parachuting, but less than 1 percent of those who have parachute ten times or more report being frightened of it.

Identify and Describe Flaw
The author assumes that the reason so few people who parachute ten times or more report being frightened by parachuting is that repeated parachuting has reduced their fear. This overlooks the possibility that those people weren’t afraid to begin with. Their lack of fear might be what causes them to parachute many times.

A
takes for granted that the greater the number of dangerous activities one engages in the less one is frightened by any one of them
The argument doesn’t concern a “greater number of dangerous activities.” It’s about one’s fear of one activity and whether doing that one activity more can reduce one’s fear of that activity.
B
neglects to consider those people who have parachuted more than once but fewer than ten times
The statistic already shows that people who parachute many times report being less frightened than people who parachute only once. The flaw concerns the author’s causal assumption, not the lack of info about people who parachuted between one and ten times.
C
takes for granted that people do not know how frightening something is unless they have tried it
The argument doesn’t concern people’s awareness of how frightening something is. It’s about whether people are frightened of an activity and whether doing that activity more reduces fear. Knowledge of one’s level of fear is a separate issue.
D
fails to take into account the possibility that people would be better off if they did not do things that terrify them
Whether people would be better off is irrelevant. The argument concerns whether doing an activity more reduces fear of that activity. The author did not conclude that doing a feared activity is a good idea or that it should be done.
E
overlooks the possibility that most people who have parachuted many times did not find it frightening initially
This possibility, if true, presents an alternate explanation for the statistics cited. Perhaps people’s lack of fear is what allowed them to parachute ten times. This undermines the author’s hypothesis, which is that parachuting ten times is what reduced their fear.

4 comments

Most economists believe that reducing the price of any product generally stimulates demand for it. However, most wine merchants have found that reducing the price of domestic wines to make them more competitive with imported wines with which they were previously comparably priced is frequently followed by an increase in sales of those imported wines.

"Surprising" Phenomenon
Why does reducing the price of domestic wine increase sales of imported wine?

Objective
Any hypothesis resolving this discrepancy must introduce a different economic effect or state a difference between wine and other products. It must explain why increasing the price of domestic wine increases sales for its competitor, imported wine—which is apparently contrary to general economic principle.

A
Economists’ studies of the prices of grocery items and their rates of sales rarely cover alcoholic beverages.
Economists believe that reducing the price of “any product” stimulates demand for it, not just grocery items. The author does not imply that demand for domestic wine is expected to increase because wine is considered a grocery item.
B
Few merchants of any kind have detailed knowledge of economic theories about the relationship between item prices and sales rates.
This refers to the knowledge of merchants, not economists. The author does not imply that merchants must be expecting higher demand in order for lowering prices to have that effect.
C
Consumers are generally willing to forgo purchasing other items they desire in order to purchase a superior wine.
This does not state that consumers perceive wines sold at higher prices to be superior. Without knowing whether consumers see imported or domestic wines as superior, this fails to explain the increased demand for imported wine.
D
Imported wines in all price ranges are comparable in quality to domestic wines that cost less.
This deepens the mystery. If imported wines are more expensive than domestic wines but of similar quality, then why did demand for them increase?
E
An increase in the demand for a consumer product is compatible with an increase in demand for a competing product.
This explains why the economic principle is not violated. Lower domestic wine prices caused demand for both types of wine to increase. This is consistent because the author never stated that demand for domestic wine decreased.

26 comments

Beck: Our computer program estimates municipal automotive use based on weekly data. Some staff question the accuracy of the program’s estimates. But because the figures it provides are remarkably consistent from week to week, we can be confident of its accuracy.

Summarize Argument: Counter-Position
Beck concludes that the computer program for estimating weekly municipal automotive use is accurate, counter to the questions of some staff. This is supported by the claim that the program’s figures are consistent every week.

Identify and Describe Flaw
Beck uses information about consistency to draw a conclusion about accuracy, which presumes that consistency guarantees accuracy. This overlooks the possibility that, for example, the program could be inaccurate by the same amount every time, making it consistent but still inaccurate.

A
fails to establish that consistency is a more important consideration than accuracy
Beck doesn’t claim that consistency is a more important consideration than accuracy, but rather that consistency is proof of accuracy.
B
fails to consider the program’s accuracy in other tasks that it may perform
Beck is only discussing the program’s accuracy in the task of estimating municipal automotive use, so other tasks aren’t relevant.
C
takes for granted that the program’s output would be consistent even if its estimates were inaccurate
Beck actually assumes the opposite of this: that the program’s output would not be consistent if its estimates were inaccurate. In other words, that the program’s output being consistent means its estimates must be accurate.
D
regards accuracy as the sole criterion for judging the program’s value
Beck isn’t talking about accuracy as a criterion for judging the program’s value, just claiming that the program is indeed accurate.
E
fails to consider that the program could produce consistent but inaccurate output
Beck’s argument assumes that consistent output means the program is accurate, but this overlooks the possibility that the program is consistent but still inaccurate.

13 comments

Inertia affects the flow of water pumped through a closed system of pipes. When the pump is first switched on, the water, which has mass, takes time to reach full speed. When the pump is switched off, inertia causes the decrease in the water flow to be gradual. The effects of inductance in electrical circuits are similar to the effects of inertia in water pipes.

Summary
Inertia affects the rate water flows through closed systems of pipes. When the pump is turned on, the water takes time to reach full speed. When the pump is turned off, inertia causes the water to gradually slow down. Inductance affects electrical circuits similarly to how inertia affects water in pipes.

Strongly Supported Conclusions
Inductance affects the rate electricity flows through electrical circuits.

A
The rate at which electrical current flows is affected by inductance.
Given that the effects of inductance are similar to the effects of inertia, inductance must affect electrical currents in a similar way to how inertia affects the flow of water.
B
The flow of electrical current in a circuit requires inertia.
We don’t know whether electrical currents require inertia. We only know that the effects of inductance are similar to the effects of inertia.
C
Inertia in the flow of water pumped by an electrically powered pump is caused by inductance in the pump’s circuits.
We don’t know what causes inertia in pipe systems. We only know that inertia affects the flow of water in pipes.
D
Electrical engineers try to minimize the effects of inductance in electrical circuits.
We don’t know what electrical engineers try to do.
E
When a water pump is switched off it continues to pump water for a second or two.
We don’t know for what amount of time water flows after a pump is turned off. We only know that the flow of water stops gradually, and gradually could refer to an ambiguous amount of time.

18 comments

Robert: The school board is considering adopting a year-round academic schedule that eliminates the traditional three-month summer vacation. This schedule should be adopted, since teachers need to cover more new material during the school year than they do now.

Samantha: The proposed schedule will not permit teachers to cover more new material. Even though the schedule eliminates summer vacation, it adds six new two-week breaks, so the total number of school days will be about the same as before.

Summarize Argument
Samantha claims that the proposed schedule won’t allow teachers to cover more new material. This is because, accounting for breaks, there will be the same number of school days as before.

Notable Assumptions
Samantha believes that all school days are equal. She assumes that the six two-week breaks will not have a different effect on how teachers are able to teach (i.e. how much material they’ll be able to cover) versus summer vacation.

A
Teachers would be willing to accept elimination of the traditional three-month summer vacation as long as the total vacation time they are entitled to each year is not reduced.
We don’t care what teachers are willing to do. We care whether an alternate schedule will allow them to cover more material than before.
B
Most parents who work outside the home find it difficult to arrange adequate supervision for their school-age children over the traditional three-month summer vacation.
We’re not interested in other benefits of the proposed schedule. We care whether an alternate schedule will allow teachers to cover more material than before.
C
In school districts that have adopted a year-round schedule that increases the number of school days per year, students show a deeper understanding and better retention of new material.
This schedule won’t increase the number of school days per year.
D
Teachers spend no more than a day of class time reviewing old material when students have been away from school for only a few weeks, but have to spend up to a month of class time reviewing after a three-month summer vacation.
Not all school days are the same. Teachers have to review much more if students have been away for a three-month summer vacation, which prohibits them from teaching new material.
E
Students prefer taking a long vacation from school during the summer to taking more frequent but shorter vacations spread throughout the year.
We don’t care what students prefer. We care whether an alternate schedule will allow teachers to cover more material than before.

6 comments