A
In countries where the average number of children per family has decreased over the last century, the incidence of allergies has increased.
B
Children in small families generally eat more kinds of very allergenic foods than children in large families do.
C
Some allergies are life threatening, while many diseases caused by germs produce only temporary discomfort.
D
Children whose parents have allergies have an above-average likelihood of developing allergies themselves.
E
Children from small families who entered day care before age one were less likely to develop allergies than children from small families who entered day care later.
This is a tough SA question that doesn't make itself easily translatable into Lawgic.
The argument in the stimulus:
(Premise) without health, happiness is not obtainable
(Premise, using Group 3 translation) happiness --> not sacrifice health [meaning you have health or you are healthy]
___________
(Conclusion) never sacrifice health to acquire money
(Conclusion, using Group 4 translation) acquire money --> not sacrifice health
So what's missing?
(sufficient assumption) acquire money --> happiness
(sufficient assumption) acquire money only if not make happiness unobtainable. The double negation "not" and "un" cancel out.
Together, we get:
acquire money --> happiness --> not sacrifice health
___________
acquire money --> not sacrifice health