Researcher: We studied two groups of subjects over a period of six months. Over this period, one of the groups had a daily routine of afternoon exercise. The other group, the control group, engaged in little or no exercise during the study. It was found that those in the exercise group got 33 percent more deep-sleep at night than did the control group. Exercising in the afternoon tends to raise body temperature slightly until after bedtime, and this extra heat induces deeper sleep.

Summary

Over six months, two groups were studied. One group exercised in the afternoon every day. The other group had little or no exercise. The people in the group that exercised were found to have 33 percent more deep-sleep compared to the group that had little or no exercise. Researchers hypothesize this is because afternoon exercise raises the body temperature slightly until after bedtime, which induces deeper sleep.

Strongly Supported Conclusions

Other activities that raise a person’s body temperature slightly before bedtime may cause that person to have increased levels of deep-sleep.

A
Regular afternoon exercise is one of the things required for adequate deep-sleep.

This answer is unsupported. Saying that regular afternoon exercise is “required” for adequate deep-sleep is too strong. We only know from the stimulus that afternoon exercise can increase deep-sleep.

B
Exercise in the morning is almost as likely to have as many beneficial effects on sleep as is exercise in the afternoon.

This answer is unsupported. The Researcher’s study is limited to exercise performed in the afternoon. We don’t know from these results what effects morning exercise could cause, if any.

C
The best way to get increased deep-sleep is to induce a slight increase in body temperature just before bedtime.

This answer is unsupported. We don’t know from the stimulus whether a slight increase in a person’s body temperature is the “best way” to get increased deep-sleep. There could exist many other methods for this same effect.

D
No one in the control group experienced a rise in body temperature just before bedtime.

This answer is unsupported. It could be true that one or two people in the control group experienced a rise in body temperature, but that doesn’t change the 33 percent increase in deep sleep for the group that exercised.

E
Raising body temperature slightly by taking a warm bath just before bedtime will likely result in increased deep-sleep.

This answer is strongly supported. The Researcher hypothesizes that the rise in body temperature is the cause of increased deep-sleep for the people in the study. Exercise is one method for achieving this effect, but there are likely to be others.


19 comments

Roger Bacon, the thirteenth-century scientist, is said to have made important discoveries in optics. He was an early advocate of hands-on experimentation, and as a teacher warned his students against relying uncritically on the opinions of authorities. Nevertheless, this did not stop Bacon himself from appealing to authority when it was expedient for his own argumentation. Thus, Bacon’s work on optics should be generally disregarded, in view of the contradiction between his statements and his own behavior.

Summarize Argument: Counter-Position
The author concludes that Bacon’s work on optics should be disregarded, even though it’s generally respected. His reasoning is that Bacon appealed to authority to support his arguments, despite hypocritically warning others not to do so.

Identify and Describe Flaw
This is a cookie-cutter attacking the source of the argument (ad hominem) flaw. The author attacks the source of certain ideas about optics, without attacking the ideas themselves.

A
presumes, without providing justification, that authority opinion is often incorrect
The author doesn’t make any presumptions about how often expert authority is (or isn’t) correct. His argument is based on Bacon’s inconsistency in sometimes relying on expert authority and sometimes not.
B
attacks Bacon’s uncritical reliance on authority opinion
The author’s critique isn’t that Bacon relies on authority opinion. It’s that he’s inconsistent about doing so: sometimes he does, sometimes he doesn’t.
C
uses Bacon’s remarks to his students as evidence of his opinions
Bacon’s remarks to his students could legitimately be used as evidence of his opinions. The author’s flaw is thinking that Bacon’s other opinions can be used to discredit his work on optics.
D
ignores the fact that thirteenth-century science may not hold up well today
On the contrary, the author’s entire argument is meant to discredit the work of a thirteenth-century scientist.
E
criticizes Bacon’s character in order to question his scientific findings
The author accuses Bacon of hypocrisy in order to undermine Bacon’s findings about optics. This is the cookie-cutter ad hominem flaw: Bacon’s other opinions or character traits aren’t relevant to his discoveries about optics.

The question stem reads: The reasoning in the argument is flawed because of the argument… This is a Weaken question.

The author beings with context, saying that Roger Bacon is a 13-century scientist who is said to have made important optics discoveries. They also claim he preached both hands-on experimentation and not uncritically relying on the opinion of authority to his students. However, the author notes that Bacon would appeal to authority when it was expedient (beneficial) for Bacon's argumentation. So Mr. Bacon was a bit of a hypocrite. The author concludes that Bacon's scientific work must be disregarded because of his hypocritical behavior.

Immediately this jumps out as an ad hominem attack, using someone's character instead of their position. In this case, the author claims we should disregard Bacon's work. Why? Because, on the authors' account, Bacon had some unsavory personality traits. When we attack opponents' arguments or work, our argument needs to be directed at that argument or work. In this case, the author has only provided reasons to think Bacon is a hypocrite and no evidence to discredit the validity of Bacon's discoveries. If this were a sufficient assumption question, we would need a premise like Hypocritie -> disregard work on optics, to bridge the gap between Bacon's personality and his work.

Answer Choice (A) is wrong because the author does not presume the authority's opinion is incorrect. If we turn to the stimulus, the author has nothing to say about whether authority opinion is correct or incorrect.

Answer Choice (B) is incorrect because the author does not actually attack the fact that Bacon relied on authority opinion. The author attacks Bacon for saying one thing and doing another. The author might think that relying on authority opinion is an acceptable practice while still taking issue with Bacon's hypocrisy.

Answer Choice (C) is incorrect because the author does not use bacon remarks to his students to make an inference of Bacon's opinions. He uses Bacon's comments to infer that he is a hypocrite.

Answer Choice (D) is incorrect because the argument is based on Bacon's character - not on whether or not thirteenth-century science holds up well today. Additionally, (D) would not be a problem for the argument as it lends some (minor) credence to the conclusion that Bacon's work should be disregarded.

Correct Answer Choice (E) is our prephase. The author criticizes Bacon's character (the hypocrisy) in order to question his scientific findings (his work on optics).


17 comments

The ability to access information via computer is a tremendous resource for visually impaired people. Only a limited amount of printed information is accessible in braille, large type, or audiotape. But a person with the right hardware and software can access a large quantity of information from libraries and museums around the world, and can have the computer read the information aloud, display it in large type, or produce a braille version. Thus, visually impaired people can now access information from computers more easily than they can from most traditional sources.

Summarize Argument
The author concludes that visually impaired people can more easily access information from computers than from traditional sources. This is because little printed information is visually accessible, whereas computer technologies can make a vast array of information visually accessible.

Notable Assumptions
For information to be “more easily accessible” to visually impaired people, the author assumes that visually impaired people have access to the right hardware and software. If this wasn’t the case, then such information wouldn’t be accessible to visually impaired people.

A
A computerized speech synthesizer is often less expensive than a complete library of audiotapes.
These are both visually accessible ways of consuming information. We don’t care which is the more expensive of these two.
B
Relatively easy-to-use computer systems that can read information aloud, display it in large type, or produce a braille version of it are widely available.
Hardware and software were potential barriers to access in the author’s argument, since it’s not a given visually impaired people have access to the right tools. This tells us they do have access to those tools.
C
Many visually impaired people prefer traditional sources of information to computers that can read information aloud, display it in large type, or produce a braille version of it.
We don’t care what they prefer. The author is simply stating the visually impaired people will have access to more information.
D
Most visually impaired people who have access to information via computer also have access to this same information via more traditional sources.
This weakens the author’s argument by stating that most visually impaired people will consume no new information on computers.
E
The rate at which printed information is converted into formats easily accessible to visually impaired people will increase.
At best, this leaves the author’s argument neutral. At worst, this weakens the author’s argument by showing that printed information is catching up to computer information.

5 comments

Legislator: The recently released crime statistics clearly show that the new laws requiring stiffer punishments for violators have reduced the crime rate. In the areas covered by those laws, the incidence of crime has decreased by one-fourth over the four years since the legislation was enacted.

Analyst: The statistics are welcome news, but they do not provide strong evidence that the new laws caused the drop in crime. Many comparable areas that lack such legislation have reported a similar drop in the crime rate during the same period.

Summarize Argument: Counter-Position
The analyst concludes that the decrease in crime in areas covered by new, stricter punishment laws does not constitute strong evidence that those laws caused the decrease in crime. The analyst supports this conclusion with a comparison to areas that have experienced a similar decrease in crime, but without similar laws.

Describe Method of Reasoning
The analyst counters the legislator’s cause-and-effect argument by pointing out comparable cases that have shown the same “effect” but that have not experienced the proposed “cause.” This suggests that there is some alternative explanation that has given rise to the effect.

A
pointing out that the legislator has provided no evidence of the reliability of the statistics on which the legislator’s conclusion is based
The analyst doesn’t call the reliability or truth of the statistics into question, only arguing that they do not necessarily support the legislator’s conclusion.
B
arguing that the legislator has unreasonably concluded that one event has caused another without ruling out the possibility that both events are effects of a common cause
The analyst doesn’t argue that the reduction in crime and the introduction of stricter laws are caused by the same thing. The analyst instead points out that the laws simply may not be the cause of the reduction in crime.
C
objecting that the statistics on which the legislator is basing his conclusion are drawn from a time period that is too short to yield a meaningful data sample
The analyst doesn’t object to the statistics in any way and accepts the decrease in crime as real.
D
claiming that the legislator has attempted to establish a particular conclusion because doing so is in the legislator’s self-interest rather than because of any genuine concern for the truth of the matter
The analyst doesn’t address the legislator’s motivation for making the argument, only arguing against the content of the argument itself.
E
implying that the legislator has drawn a conclusion about cause and effect without considering how often the alleged effect has occurred in the absence of the alleged cause
The analyst points to cases where the same effect has occurred (a decrease in crime) but that have not been subject to the legislator’s assumed cause (the stricter laws). This is used to suggest that the cause-and-effect conclusion drawn by the legislator is unjustified.

12 comments

In an experiment, researchers played a series of musical intervals—two-note sequences—to a large, diverse group of six-month-old babies. They found that the babies paid significantly more attention when the intervals were perfect octaves, fifths, or fourths than otherwise. These intervals are prevalent in the musical systems of most cultures around the world. Thus, humans probably have a biological predisposition to pay more attention to those intervals than to others.

Summarize Argument: Phenomenon-Hypothesis
The author concludes that humans likely have a biological predisposition to certain musical intervals. This is based on a study where babies paid more attention to certain intervals than others, and the fact certain intervals are prevalent around the world.

Notable Assumptions
In order for the study to signify a biological predisposition, the babies in the study can’t have any prior musical conditioning. Otherwise, we could conclude that the babies were simply more accustomed to those intervals and thus paid more attention. The author must also assume that many cultures around the world weren’t influenced by some single or small group of musical systems. If they were, then the presence of certain intervals would signify cultural influence rather than biological predisposition.

A
Several similar experiments using older children and adults found that these subjects, too, had a general tendency to pay more attention to octaves, fifths, and fourths than to other musical intervals.
We don’t care about older children. Older children have definitely already been exposed to music.
B
None of the babies in the experiment had previous exposure to music from any culture.
This defends against a potential weakener. If the babies in the study had already been exposed to music, then we could imagine their interest in certain intervals came from that exposure. But since they hadn’t been exposed to music, their interest was purely natural.
C
All of the babies in the experiment had been exposed to music drawn equally from a wide variety of cultures around the world.
This weakens the author’s argument. If the babies had already been exposed to music, then their interest in certain intervals likely came from that exposure.
D
In a second experiment, these same babies showed no clear tendency to notice primary colors more than other colors.
We don’t care about primary colors.
E
Octaves, fifths, and fourths were played more frequently during the experiment than other musical intervals were.
If anything, this weakens the author’s argument. Perhaps the babies paid attention to these intervals because they were played frequently, rather than because of some biological disposition towards these intervals.

38 comments