Posts Tagged ‘Logical Reasoning’

Questions of the resolve, reconcile, and explain type ask us to understand the logical gap between elements of the stimulus- and what’s required to bridge it. This class will explore the strategies best applied to RRE questions!
Difficulty: 3-5 Stars
Pace: 4-6 Questions


Comment on this

A significant portion of a typical LR section is made up of Weaken, Strengthen, and Evaluate questions. These three closely-related question types all ask us: what would tip the scales for an argument? Sharpen your skills while exploring the important similarities and differences between them!
Difficulty: 3-5 Stars
Pace: 5-8 Questions


Comment on this

One of the most atypical question types, Point at Issue questions ask us to pinpoint where two arguments differ or align without getting distracted by other elements in the split stimulus. Learn how should your approach differ when there are two arguments to consider, and how to avoid the red herrings this question type often features!
Difficulty: 3-5 stars
Pace 4-6 questions


Comment on this

Split into PSAr (find the rule) and PSAa (application) questions, these cousins of Sufficient Assumption questions tend to be less straightforward- and thus more difficult! This class will cover the concepts and strategies that are essential for effectively navigating both variants of this question type.
Difficulty: 3-5 stars
Pace: 3-6 Questions


Comment on this

Sufficient and necessary conditions are some of the most common logical elements encountered in logical reasoning. Easily confused with each other and often unintuitive, they can make for some truly hard SA and NA questions! This class will cover the concepts and strategies that are essential for effectively navigating both question types.
Difficulty: 2-5 stars
Pace: 5-7 Questions


Comment on this

The closely related Parallel Reasoning and Parallel Flaw question types are often regarded as the most difficult and time consuming of the LR types. They don't have to be! This class will cover key concepts and strategies that will help you navigate parallel reasoning with accuracy and confidence.
Difficulty: 3-5 Stars
Pace: 3-5 questions


Comment on this

Ready to leave the 160s behind and hit the 170s? In Cracking 170, Nicole will guide you through the must-know Logical Reasoning techniques that can take your score to the next level. Each week, we’ll tackle a different LR skill, helping you fine-tune your approach and conquer even the toughest questions with ease. Get the tools and confidence you need to break through and crush your LSAT goals.
Difficulty: Question difficulty will vary depending on each class’s topic, but this is an advanced class. Everyone is welcome, but we may redirect foundational questions to our weekend AMA class to keep the class moving along.
Pace: Varies.

Comment on this

Struggling with LR? This class is your safe space for building confidence, one question at a time. Let’s work through it together—no pressure, just progress! You’ll work methodically with your instructor: breaking down the stimulus, evaluating each answer choice, and identifying underlying patterns that will show up again and again.
Difficulty: Foundational, 1-4 stars
Pace: Slow, 3-6 questions


Comment on this

Struggling with LR? This class is your safe space for building confidence, one question at a time. Let’s work through it together—no pressure, just progress! You’ll work methodically with your instructor: breaking down the stimulus, evaluating each answer choice, and identifying underlying patterns that will show up again and again.
Difficulty: Foundational, 1-4 stars
Pace: Slow, 3-6 questions


Comment on this

Both MSS and MBT questions ask us to evaluate inferences- what can be validly drawn for the stimulus, and are all valid inferences equally valid? This class will explore the significant similarities and differences between the two classes, with an emphasis on the tips and strategies best applied when you encounter a question of either type on the test.
Difficulty: 3-5 Stars
Pace: 4-6 Questions


Comment on this