Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Categories
- 34.3K All Categories
- 28.8K LSAT
- 17.4K General
- 5.3K Logical Reasoning
- 1.4K Reading Comprehension
- 1.7K Logic Games
- 72 Podcasts
- 192 Webinars
- 13 Scholarships
- 193 Test Center Reviews
- 2.4K Study Groups
- 119 Study Guides/Cheat Sheets
- 2.6K Specific LSAT Dates
- 38 November 2024 LSAT
- 18 October 2024 LSAT
- 10 September 2024 LSAT
- 41 August 2024 LSAT
- 30 June 2024 LSAT
- 5 April 2024 LSAT
- 11 February 2024 LSAT
- 23 January 2024 LSAT
- 38 November 2023 LSAT
- 43 October 2023 LSAT
- 14 September 2023 LSAT
- 38 August 2023 LSAT
- 27 June 2023 LSAT
- 30 Sage Advice
- 5.1K Not LSAT
- 4.1K Law School Admissions
- 13 Law School Explained
- 10 Forum Rules
- 675 Technical Problems
- 291 Off-topic
Hallstown Groceries – PF Question
yeshesvini
Member
https://classic.7sage.com/lesson/hallstown-groceries-pf-question/?ss_completed_lesson=1143
while i agree AC b is incorrect...still seems to be a perfectly valid argument to me....anyone care to parse this one with me?
validity of answer choice B
Comments
Hey! So it looks like that is, in fact, a valid argument. The Manhattan forum and LSAT Hacks website also seem to say the same.
(for reference, see here: https://www.manhattanprep.com/lsat/forums/q22-most-people-who-shop-for-groceries-t1513.html
https://lsathacks.com/explanations/lsat-preptest-32/logical-reasoning-1/q-22/)
It's basically affirming the sufficient, so it's certainly within the realm of valid arguments.
/Own a car --> /Drive
John /Own a car
--
John /Drive