Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Categories
- 34.2K All Categories
- 28.8K LSAT
- 17.4K General
- 5.3K Logical Reasoning
- 1.4K Reading Comprehension
- 1.7K Logic Games
- 72 Podcasts
- 192 Webinars
- 13 Scholarships
- 193 Test Center Reviews
- 2.4K Study Groups
- 118 Study Guides/Cheat Sheets
- 2.6K Specific LSAT Dates
- 38 November 2024 LSAT
- 18 October 2024 LSAT
- 10 September 2024 LSAT
- 41 August 2024 LSAT
- 30 June 2024 LSAT
- 5 April 2024 LSAT
- 11 February 2024 LSAT
- 23 January 2024 LSAT
- 38 November 2023 LSAT
- 43 October 2023 LSAT
- 14 September 2023 LSAT
- 38 August 2023 LSAT
- 27 June 2023 LSAT
- 30 Sage Advice
- 5.1K Not LSAT
- 4.1K Law School Admissions
- 13 Law School Explained
- 10 Forum Rules
- 670 Technical Problems
- 292 Off-topic
flaw language
![[Deleted User]](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/5f0dd321222cec79e2240f6f65f81491?default=identicon&s=144)
[Deleted User]
Free Trial
Can someone explain what these languages in flaw reasoning questions mean:
Takes for granted that
Fails to rule out the possibility that
It overlooks the possibility that
Takes for granted that
Fails to rule out the possibility that
It overlooks the possibility that
Comments
2) Doesn't consider the alternative
3) Doesn't consider the alternative