Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
diana1493
About
- Username
- diana1493
- Joined
- Visits
- 376
- Last Active
- Roles
- Member
Comments
-
Yes +1 to the aforementioned resources and I want to add that you shouldn't feel discouraged because you arent doing well in RC based on the experiences you mentioned. I felt the same way as you when I first realized how bad I was bombing RC. Like m…
-
You are definitely not alone, first of all. LR has been my strong suit for a long time, I was averaging -2 for both sections and would often hit a perfect score on a section. So I was definitely having a confidence crisis when I went -8 for LR on PT…
-
Im sorry for misunderstanding! Yes you definitely will. For LR specifically, drilling Flaw questions helped me a ton with my elimination skills (I currently average -3 for both LR sections). It allows you to get really familiar with all of the flaws…
-
To quote @nicole.hopkins, your only job on the LSAT is to eliminate 4 wrong AC's for every question. It's much more effective to find what's wrong with AC's then to look for the one that looks right. Obviously there are some very easy questions that…
-
What miss @nicole.hopkins said and I'll add that if you are dead set on December, I would focus on PT'ing the very newest tests, the 60s and 70s since you really can only get ~13 more PTs with BR in. I am also taking the December exam and am taking …
-
@josephellengar: Thank you so much for responding, I feel a lot better about the 4 section tests I have in my schedule. I also really like the advice on meditation, look forward to implementing that.
-
@josephellengar Just a side question as I lurk, great advice by the way. I know you have rocked various LSAT and done extensive PTing, are 4 section PT's not a problem? I know i should do as many as possible with 5 sections but I work full time and …
-
Do you have access to the course content? I seem to remember some logic diagramming drills. But I would just recommend drilling those question types if they are giving you a hard time. I will also note that ideally you should get to a place where yo…
-
I thought of it this way: If the witnesses mentioned are less inclined to be swayed by the questioning, then that would mean when Lawyer 1 is trying to mess them up they would not be influenced. Hence, less inaccuracies. When lawyer 2 is trying to g…
-
I just took this prep test yesterday! Here was my thought process on the test, I actually almost went with C until I chose A because: Jacksons passing Sarah's number along would not be hard and would be helpful to Sarah. They did not lead Sarah to …
-
If you have time at the end of each section, meaning timing is not a problem, and you are still missing a lot, I would think that you still need to work more on your fundamentals. I personally feel accuracy comes before timing, so maybe you need to …
-
@movanation said: A friend of mine suggested a golden ticket, and it's worked wonders for me. HIGHLIGHTER baby. As the trainer notes, "let the main points right the way!" You seem to have had a lot of success with highlighting, a technique you d…
-
@nicole.hopkins and others who want to hear Nicole's words of wisdom on RC-- we should all decide on a good time to do a Skype call so Nicole only has to explain it all once I saw your message Nicole, and unfortunately Friday (tomorrow) I am going …
-
@nicole.hopkins Thanks once again!
-
@nicole.hopkins Thank you so much for the recommendations, I have been lurking on here for a bit and you are so awesome! Should I take every PT with 5 sections?