@FixedDice said:
Still however, I fail to see how this is a necessary assumption. If this assumption were false, then the conclusion of the argument could very plausibly remain true. The support of the premises for the conclusion, how…
@"surfy surf" said:
You arent disputing the truth or falsity of the conclusion or premises in any LR question.
In NA questions, you are drawing a link between the premises and conclusion. Your only task in NA questions is to make the prem…
@"surfy surf" said:
@zcpersing said:
@"surfy surf" said:
I'm gonna let you figure it out by saying this:
The human species is in danger when at least 2/3 of the population dies.
2/3 of people …
@FixedDice said:
My thought is that this is not a necessary assumption as the argument's conclusion could still be valid if the general population was declining MORE than the nesting female population (which would mean the decline was n…
@FixedDice said:
FYI, there's a forum rule against quoting directly from PTs.
Thank you. I was unaware of this rule. I have since edited the post to paraphrase the test. Thank you again.
@"surfy surf" said:
I'm gonna let you figure it out by saying this:
The human species is in danger when at least 2/3 of the population dies.
2/3 of people with blue hair have died.
Thus, the human population is in danger.
The…