Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Heart Shaped Box
About
- Username
- Heart Shaped Box
- Joined
- Visits
- 6,652
- Last Active
- Roles
- Member, ⭐
Comments
-
I have the similar concern as @"emlyn.medalla" in terms of the experimental section. I’ve been putting off doing the digital test largely cuz I wasn’t sure what to do with the experimental (u know, with paper I just break a test and have someone els…
-
Thank you 7sage
-
7sage rocks thank you!
-
Really didn't expect this I've been struggling w the flu and fever for a good chunk of time been putting a hold on studying (apologies to 7sagers for late/none responses), this truly warms my heart, thank you 7sage, this community amazes me everyday…
-
Yeah, it’s ‘sorta’ like one of those IP right thing where J.Y. and the entire 7Sage team put together their knowledge into a package at a fraction of the cost and you can acquire those knowledge by compensating their hardwork at a very reasonable ra…
-
Thank you 7sage, happy Chinese new year in advance to all 7sagers!
-
Thank you 7sage and happy 2019! It's a new chapter so me bombing PT75 yesterday is officially in the past! lol
-
Since you didn’t provide details in terms of exactly where the confusion is with E, just as a guess I think the reason it gives you pause ‘maybe’ bc you don’t necessarily agree “no opinion” is the same as “not believing” hence the exception clause w…
-
Thank you 7sage, ❤ this community
-
Thank you 7sage and happy Friday everyone!
-
Thank you 7sage, truly proud to be a part of this community.
-
Such an honor. Thank you 7sage, this community is the best.
-
Thanks man I appreciate it! I'm a slow poke but it's coming along. Now looking back all the "fights" (not really) we had in CC back in the day, good times!
-
This is awesome J! (If I may still call u that lol) should definitely do a webinar we can’t wait to hear about your journey!
-
Thank you 7sage! Really appreciate this community.
-
Agreed with much said above. If anything, I do find "most" could come in play with parallel reasoning/parallel flaw questions. In those type of Qs, the pattern of (flawed) "reasoning" is what's at play, not necessarily the language and even the stru…
-
Always an honor, thank you 7sage and congrats everyone
-
Oh wow thank you guys so much I really appreciate it. I'll be going to the beach for a break so I'll be away for a couple of days but I'll use the money to get myself a 'real' pair of swimming trunks since I've been using my basketball shorts as rep…
-
Nirvana all the way!! And most importantly "Heart Shaped Box"!
-
7sage rocks, thank you and congrats everyone
-
Very inspiristional @JustDoIt! On the same boat as you, low diagnostic, lone wolf, been a difficult long journey..so glad to hear such an amazing success story from someone I can actually relate to, it motivates me to work even harder now. I sincere…
-
I learned everything from 7sage, literally started at zero. I will continue to help out folks and give back to this community. Thank you everyone, sincerely.
-
I'm not sure if it would solve the question but I believe the negation would be, Fav mention --> compromise Negated: Fav mention and C Paid ad -- > threat integrity and loyalty Negated: Paid ad some threat integrity or loyalty I've shor…
-
@akistotle said: I think the point here is that the premise doesn't give us /PC. @akistotle nailed it. We are never told PC. This reminds me of the infamous inference on "two clinics: Souderton or Randsborough" game (PT34.S4.Game …
-
If B is true at all times, then it would be different statements without involving A. We just can't say from A --> B, therefore it could be true that A --> B. Same with studying for the LSAT 24/7 for the rest of our lives. Now, if that's the …
-
@thrillhouse Let's look at it this way: "All cats drink milk" Yes, it could be true that something that's not cat can drink milk, (my dog) hence C and Milk or C some milk could be true. However, it's not true if we say "anything" that's not a ca…
-
No it doesn't, and that's the key issue here. It cannot be true that A --> B just based on A --> B. The only possibility we have from that statement would be A and B or A some B, if we need to conclude B.
-
@thrillhouse Good question. A --> B From this I don't think we could conclude A --> B, the "conditional arrow" is the key here. We can say based on A --> B, it could be true that something not an A, (A) and yet we could still get a B: A…
-
@"surfy surf" PC isn’t a floater If economy is weak, prices are constant EW -> PC /PC -> /EW True, if econ is weak, then prices are constant. But, we are never told PC, hence we can't take the contrapostive of PC --> EW, a…
-
Scratch the whole thing above lol i was only reading your translation earlier but after I looked at the question just now, I think I found the issue. Your contrapositive of the stimulus is incorrect. PC is a floater, hence /PC --> /EW is incorrec…