Try writing out explanations for LR questions you get wrong. Explain them in theoretical terms, i.e. which flaw it is, etc... This should help you see the process and the familiar traps on future questions.
As for missing a rule, make a mark next to the rule after diagramming it. As for mixing up, or other confusions, double check your diagramming before continuing to the game. From then on, be absolutely confident in your diagram. Only if everything i…
I transferred in sections. For LR, when I would turn a page. For LG, per LG. For RC, per RC.
Whatever you choose to do, develop a habit of it so that you don't slip up.
I'd agree with @AlenaLSAT. Speed really comes with more understanding. Take your time to review well and integrate the ideas into your thinking. When it becomes natural, you will inevitably be working through questions faster.
Most of my PTs were done with a -35 clock. For LG, you're best bet is doing more games to get quicker at recognizing patterns and diagramming. When I was prepping, I had a stack of LG, multiple copies of each one, and would grab a few to do when I h…
Ya, I think one has to be committed to correcting any mistake. No one would say: "well, since my goal is a 168, I don't really care why I got those few wrong."
Yes, depending on the school one is trying to reach, a particular score is needed. But even in such a case, don't settle for a score that guarantees admission; a better score can always garner scholarships.
Everyone is different. It does not need to take a year to reach 170.
If you're just starting, the cold diagnostic is meaningful, but what really counts is how well you can learn the LSAT logic and techniques.
Don't look towards doing what everyon…
Some scotch maybe.
Good luck on your first test. You might be nervous because it's your first test. As you practice more of them, you'll become familiar with them. Hopefully, you'll develop your rhythm and be less anxious.
The LSAT is important bu…
Okay, you want the MAX amount of films. And once you show G, you can no longer show L.
On Friday, G or L must be the final show. If it is G, L will be barred for Saturday - so you'd rather have L as the final show of Friday (so you can get the most…
Yes, I overstated it by saying the conclusion is justified. It is what the question refers to it as - a principle underlying the conclusion. I guess you can look at it as 'pseudo-sufficient'.
It is hard to give an adequate answer without more information: what were you scoring, what was your prep like, what question types did you find difficulty with, etc...
Feel free to message me and I'll try to help.
Yes, but it should be stated regarding unacceptability.
If there is a disagreement on important issue - as there is with L and M - then you would need more 'such' (i.e. important issues) disagreements with other candidates for L and M to be accept…
The answer choice (A) is an assumption that justifies the conclusion, but potentially there could be other reasons. So (A) is a sufficient assumption for the conclusion, not a necessary one.
Stimulus states the confidence of a witness has little correlation to accuracy. A witness can be 100% sure the suspect was "X" when it was really "Y". Or, a witness can be uncertain, yet accurate. There are various factors that affect confidence, bu…